[Syslog] protocol document review

2007-06-15 Thread David Harrington
Hi, The protocol document has been republished. Since the document had been submitted to the IESG for approval, and been through IETF Last Call, and the republication addressed issues raised during IETF Last Call, the post-IETF-Last-Call approval process is continuing automatically. We are in the

RE: [Syslog] New -protocol document - your comments needed by 25 June

2007-06-15 Thread David Harrington
Hi, Would it be helpful to identify where in the architecture the facility exists? I think some people think the originator is the thing that asks syslog to send a message (is that the facility?), while others think the syslog thing that creates the syslog message (e.g. syslogd) is the

[Syslog] -syslog-tc-mib Facilities

2007-06-15 Thread Chris Lonvick
Hi Folks, The discussion came up about the use of the Facilities in the -syslog-tc-mib document; are they normative or non-normative. David and I discussed this and have concluded that they are normative to the version of the protocol that we are now discussing. That may be changed in the