Hi WG,
Things are changing in the IETF around documenting the management and
operations of protocols. The OPS Area WG has been documenting a change of
approach, in which SNMP and MIBs are not the only way to configure,
manage and operate a protocol, and existing practices are taken into
Does defining configuration concepts require that you define the
functional aspects of syslog application?
I can see many different uses of syslog, each requiring different
configuration. It all depends on the context it is used in. It can be
stand-along, it can be embedded, it can be part of
Hi Anton,
Perhaps I wasn't so verbose in my original posting. Documenting the SNMP
MIBs will give us counters and a way to configure syslog via SNMP. We've
had many discussions of what we want to count, and how it _should_ add up.
We've also had discussions on how to tell a syslog device
Hi,
[as co-chair]
This discussion started between Chris and I concerning the remaining
charter item of submitting the Syslog Device MIB.
The existing MIB has been rather controversial, and has knobs for
configuring syslog using the MIB, when osme implementers say they have
no demand for a MIB
Hi,
[as contributor]
Traditionally, standards are based on some level of agreement across
multiple implementations about what should be standardized.
I have looked at syslog MIB modules from multiple vendors and have not
found any that model the same concepts that the current syslog MIB
models.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:43:33PM -0500, David Harrington wrote:
[as co-chair]
This discussion started between Chris and I concerning the remaining
charter item of submitting the Syslog Device MIB.
The existing MIB has been rather controversial, and has knobs for
configuring syslog using
