omentarily.
--- Alex
-Original Message-
From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:52 PM
To: 'Miao Fuyou'; Alexander Clemm (alex); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Note to editors
Hi,
Actually, all you need to provide is the
13, 2007 4:52 PM
> To: Alexander Clemm ((alex))
> Cc: David Harrington; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] Note to editors
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Alexander Clemm ((alex)) wrote:
>
> > David,
> >
> > I am using the xml2rfc tool, whi
ay, March 13, 2007 8:42 PM
> To: 'Alexander Clemm (alex)'; 'David Harrington'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Note to editors
>
> Hi,
>
> I reckon this happens because the "date" in the "front" part
> of the XML file
> i
gt; Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 2:18 AM
> To: David Harrington; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Note to editors
>
> David,
>
> I am using the xml2rfc tool, which inserts these automatically.
> However, the copyright statement does show 2006, not 2007,
> when
On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Alexander Clemm ((alex)) wrote:
David,
I am using the xml2rfc tool, which inserts these automatically.
However, the copyright statement does show 2006, not 2007, when I
generate the draft now.
What would you like to do? It seems preferrable that IETF should get
-
From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Syslog] Note to editors
Hi,
We have crossed into 2007.
Please make sure any copyrights in your document reflect 2007, not 2006.
This includes the standard copyright, but also
Hi,
We have crossed into 2007.
Please make sure any copyrights in your document reflect 2007, not
2006. This includes the standard copyright, but also internal
copyrights in MIB modules, etc.
Please make sure the IPR boilerplate and any other copyrights have
been updated to RFC 4748, which reco