] Working Group Last Calls
tom.petch wrote:
c. In Table 1
Facility 9,15 both denote the clock daemon
Facility 4,14 both denote security/authorization messages
So what:-)
a. I would consider that to be sloppy specs. I will not argue
any further on that point
- Original Message -
From: Glenn M. Keeni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Calls
Hi,
Sincere apologies for the delay in sending the following comments
on the Syslog Protocol document. I faced
Hi,
Sincere apologies for the delay in sending the following comments
on the Syslog Protocol document. I faced problems with these while
trying to align the mib document with the protocol document
In section 6.2.1
a. The concept of Facility in the syslog protocol context should
be
Sorry, the comments are for syslog-protocol.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 5:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Working Group Last Calls
Hi,
Some my review finding:
1, originator
Hi,
The WGLC for -protocol-17 and -udp-07 documents will end later today.
Please review and comment on these documents today.
David Harrington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
