RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-30 Thread Rainer Gerhards
; From: tom.petch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:09 PM > To: David Harrington; 'Chris Lonvick' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog > > I too have looked at proprietary syslog MIB m

Re: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-22 Thread tom.petch
COMPLIANCE optional. Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "David Harrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Chris Lonvick'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 11:58 PM Subject

RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-17 Thread Steve Chang (schang99)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog > > David, > > [speaking as a syslog implementor] > > let me compare a few well known implementations when it comes to > syslog.conf: > > Solaris - supports base format > Sysklogd

RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread Rainer Gerhards
TED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 11:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Chris Lonvick' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog > > Hi, > > [as contributor] > Traditionally, standards are based on some level of a

Re: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:43:33PM -0500, David Harrington wrote: > [as co-chair] > This discussion started between Chris and I concerning the remaining > charter item of submitting the Syslog Device MIB. > > The existing MIB has been rather controversial, and has knobs for > configuring syslog

RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread David Harrington
PM > To: Chris Lonvick > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:59:25PM -0800, Chris Lonvick wrote: > > [...] > > I do not understand whether this is a discussion for re-chartering the >

RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread David Harrington
aelder > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:15 PM > To: Chris Lonvick > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:59:25PM -0800, Chris Lonvick wrote: > > [...] > >

Re: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:59:25PM -0800, Chris Lonvick wrote: [...] I do not understand whether this is a discussion for re-chartering the syslog WG or whether this is a discussion to clarify the current charter or something else. Taking the charter question aside for the moment, I personally c

RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread Chris Lonvick
Hi Anton, Perhaps I wasn't so verbose in my original posting. Documenting the SNMP MIBs will give us counters and a way to configure syslog via SNMP. We've had many discussions of what we want to count, and how it _should_ add up. We've also had discussions on how to tell a syslog device how

RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread Alexander Clemm (alex)
4 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog Does defining configuration concepts require that you define the functional aspects of syslog application? I can see many different uses of syslog, each requiring different configuration. It all depends on

RE: [Syslog] Documenting the configuration of syslog

2008-01-16 Thread Anton Okmyanskiy (aokmians)
Does defining configuration concepts require that you define the functional aspects of syslog application? I can see many different uses of syslog, each requiring different configuration. It all depends on the context it is used in. It can be stand-along, it can be embedded, it can be part of a