omentarily.
--- Alex
-Original Message-
From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:52 PM
To: 'Miao Fuyou'; Alexander Clemm (alex); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Note to editors
Hi,
Actually, all you need to provide is the
13, 2007 4:52 PM
> To: Alexander Clemm ((alex))
> Cc: David Harrington; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] Note to editors
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Alexander Clemm ((alex)) wrote:
>
> > David,
> >
> > I am using the xml2rfc tool, whi
ay, March 13, 2007 8:42 PM
> To: 'Alexander Clemm (alex)'; 'David Harrington'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Note to editors
>
> Hi,
>
> I reckon this happens because the "date" in the "front" part
> of the XML file
> i
gt; Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 2:18 AM
> To: David Harrington; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Note to editors
>
> David,
>
> I am using the xml2rfc tool, which inserts these automatically.
> However, the copyright statement does show 2006, not 2007,
> when
On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Alexander Clemm ((alex)) wrote:
David,
I am using the xml2rfc tool, which inserts these automatically.
However, the copyright statement does show 2006, not 2007, when I
generate the draft now.
What would you like to do? It seems preferrable that IETF should get
David,
I am using the xml2rfc tool, which inserts these automatically.
However, the copyright statement does show 2006, not 2007, when I
generate the draft now.
What would you like to do? It seems preferrable that IETF should get
xml2rfc updated.
Thanks
--- Alex
-Original Message
