David Harrington wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Having discussed this further with you and Rainer, I tend to agree the
changes are smaller than I originally thought.
So that the WG can properly assess this, can you produce an individual
draft with the proposed changes, so the WG can discuss the changes and
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] RFC3195bis
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Hi.
>
> > The WG consensus points that affect syslog-sign dependencies on
> > RFC3195 are:
> >
> > 1) remove RFC3195 references to RFC3164, and use the WG -protoco
Hi,
Hi.
The WG consensus points that affect syslog-sign dependencies on
RFC3195 are:
1) remove RFC3195 references to RFC3164, and use the WG -protocol-
document as the appropriate replacement reference.
In most cases this is fairly straightfoward. As I indicated in my
email, and as
David,
> -Original Message-
> From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Syslog] RFC3195bis
[.. big snip ..]
> Chris and I did not agree that RAW mode should be obsoleted and
> replaced with a new mode.
