Chris, WG:
as you are probably aware, Sam's deadline for comments about the future
of this WG is quickly approaching (it is December, 1st). I plan to
formally update my comment. To do so, I would like to know if we have
reached consensus on the charter.
I have taken the liberty to merge some
Are we happy to recharter when these are done to cover TCP ?
Darren
___
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
Darren,
I am not long enough with the IETF to know how much trouble it is to
recharter - but I think whatever it is, it is acceptable. You very
correctly said that we need to do baby steps. And as a matter of past
discussions, it seems to be necessary to explicitely exclude some things
to get the
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Security Issues in Network Event Logging
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Signed syslog Messages
Author(s) : J. Kelsey, et al.
Filename
Hello,
I just wanted to let you all know that I have submitted a new draft of
syslog sign, as the old one was about to expire. The new draft should
appear shortly if it hasn't already; here is a summary of the changes
and updates that were made.
The changes were along the lines of what was
Chris:
I think having SD-ID with [enc=utf-8 lang=English] may be a good
approach. If different language use utf-8 encoding, then lang= can
distinguish it.
Also want to clarify that you suggest that if the message is in ASCII,
it will not required SD-ID, but for all other encodings, SD-ID will
