Re: Why not TLS was Re: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input

2005-10-26 Thread Tom Petch
accept that SSL dominates). Tom Petch - Original Message - From: Rodney Thayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 11:46 PM Subject: Re: Why not TLS was Re: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input Tom Petch wrote: In the context of isms, ie

RE: Why not TLS was Re: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input

2005-10-26 Thread Moehrke, John \(GE Healthcare\)
There is a miss understanding of the information I have seen given by many people on this list regarding TLS. I think this miss understanding is also being applied to SSH. Most people get the facts right on server-side-authentication. SSL for years supported Server side authentication. This

RE: Why not TLS was Re: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input

2005-10-26 Thread Moehrke, John \(GE Healthcare\)
, 2005 1:44 PM To: Tom Petch; Moehrke, John (GE Healthcare); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Why not TLS was Re: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input TLS does support mutual node authentication. The healthcare world has been using mutual-node-authenticated-TLS for over three years. We use