Hi WG,
I am cleaning up bullet points for the edit.
http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/protocol/issue12.html
Talks about time zone infos, as it looks this has been sufficiently
solved in -protocol-03. So I am going to set this to solved (with no
edit in -04). Please let me know if you think otherwise.
WG,
I am going to move the enterprise ID to the origin SD-ID (and move it
OUT of the required header). I think this is the best concensus that can
be seen from previous discussion:
http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/protocol/issue7.html
Again, please make yourself heard if you have some good arguments
Hi WG,
this is in regard to issue 14, which talks about allowing the
unqualified hostname. Based on previous feedback, I think this is
concensus in the WG (see http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/protocol/issue14.html
for a short list).
If nobody objects, I will go ahead and edit it in the following way:
Anton:
thanks for the reminder. I agree with you. I will edit some wording in
this spirit. We can fine-polish it in the next revision if there is
need.
Rainer
-Original Message-
From: Anton Okmianski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:19 PM
To: Rainer Gerhards
Rainer:
Are you going to specify a message size limit in -protocol?
I think we do need some limit. For fragmentation in -protocol I need
to know how many bytes to dedicate to the fragment offset and
potentially message length.
I suggest we limit it to 4GB in size (32 bit size) or 16MB (24 bit
