On 7 May 2011 23:43, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 May 2011 23:30, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote:
You need capabilities in your kernel, or comment its use out, in the
service file.
I think I have capabilities in my kernel: CONFIG_SECURITY=y which
means
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 00:39 +0200 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 00:20, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Montag, den 02.05.2011, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
Hmm, this should be enough to include in util.c, not util.h, right?
I tried adding it just to `util.c` and it
Op 5 mei 2011, om 19:54 heeft Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/src/util.c b/src/util.c
index f0051ee..5af9161 100644
--- a/src/util.c
+++ b/src/util.c
@@ -3426,6 +3426,18 @@ void
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:52, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 May 2011 23:43, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 May 2011 23:30, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote:
You need capabilities in your kernel, or comment its use out, in the
service file.
I think I have
于 2011年05月10日 00:10, Scott James Remnant 写道:
Hey, I've been reading through the documentation on systemd and the Mailing
List Archives and have had some questions, so I figured I'd post them here.
These might be fairly complicated or unusual cases, and there may be no good
answers now, and
Another question I wasn't able to find an answer to in the documentation
I've read so far.
The use of device units seems to very much rely on udevd running on the
system, and not only that, udev rules having been parsed for the device and
a systemd tag set in the udevdb. udev obviously starts
Hi Scott,
Some answers below, but consider reading Lennart's reply first. I'll try to
cover some points he did not in his reply.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Scott James Remnant sc...@netsplit.comwrote:
Hey, I've been reading through the documentation on systemd and the Mailing
List
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 20:04 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
[…]
We can now boot a reasonably complete GNOME userspace in less than
1s.
Is there a demo image for that? What are the hardware specs?
Will you be on the LinuxTag? coreboot will be demoing systems, e. g.,
Lenovo X60/T60,
On Mon, 09.05.11 11:53, Scott James Remnant (sc...@netsplit.com) wrote:
Another question I wasn't able to find an answer to in the documentation
I've read so far.
The use of device units seems to very much rely on udevd running on the
system, and not only that, udev rules having been parsed
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Paul Menzel
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 20:04 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
[…]
We can now boot a reasonably complete GNOME userspace in less than
1s.
Is there a demo image for that? What are the hardware specs?
On Mon, 09.05.11 16:16, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
wrote:
But I do agree with you an a way to state our priorities would be awesome.
This is what Lennart said about a future way to feed it to kernel. I
suggested some hackish way some time ago:
I actually discussed
Paul Menzel wrote:
We can now boot a reasonably complete GNOME userspace in less than
1s.
Is there a demo image for that? What are the hardware specs?
Yes, a short and sweet way to reproduce these results would be
lovely. I was hoping to build a userspace with systemd for the
machines, but
On Mon, 09.05.11 21:51, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
This means there are a large number of devices already known to the kernel
at the point that systemd starts, especially if you build the drivers into
the kernel for those devices. It's possible to get going straight away
On Mon, 09.05.11 21:29, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 20:04 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
[…]
We can now boot a reasonably complete GNOME userspace in less than
1s.
Is there a demo image for that? What are the hardware specs?
On Mon, 09.05.11 16:16, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
wrote:
Well, right now let's make clear that Firefox/Chromium or other X clients
won't be started by systemd as they are user session applications, and
systemd itself will just deal with system context (ie: up to
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 22:08, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 09.05.11 22:02, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
It's still in the 10 second range on a 600MHz cortex-a8 machine
booting from an SD card. I need to dig out my 400MHz arm920t to see
how
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 22:17 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 09.05.11 21:29, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 20:04 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
[…]
We can now boot a reasonably complete GNOME userspace in less
On Mon, 09.05.11 22:35, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
But quite frankly I won't have the time to do spend time on that, sorry.
Surely you will come by for a few minutes to see with your own eyes what
you hear from all the visitors about that awesome user experience
On Sun, 08.05.11 13:39, Miklos Vajna (vmik...@frugalware.org) wrote:
Hi,
See the attached patch - we recently switched to Plymouth, this patch
enables the plymouth bits in systemd for Frugalware.
Thanks.
Thanks, applied.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
Hi,
Another systemd error I am encountering is:
Failed to get D-Bus connection: Failed to connect to socket
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/private: Connection refused
The message appears a lot throughout boot, full logs here:
http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20110509/systemd-boot.txt
It also means I
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 22:39, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 09.05.11 22:35, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
But quite frankly I won't have the time to do spend time on that, sorry.
Surely you will come by for a few minutes to see with your
On Sun, 08.05.11 13:01, floydsm...@aol.com (floydsm...@aol.com) wrote:
I guess this might be somthing like:
cd /
ln -sf ../../../lib/systemd/system/3.target
etc/systemd/system/default.target
but with 3 replaced by 6 (for shutdown).
I need such a service so that I on shutdown I can have a
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 09.05.11 16:16, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
wrote:
Well, right now let's make clear that Firefox/Chromium or other X clients
won't be started by systemd as they are user session
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:45:51PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
2011/4/3 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 03.04.11 23:28, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
But for /dev/shm I see no quick fix... do you?
Unfortunately not. No one foresaw that quota support on
:
http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20110509/systemd-boot.txt
You are lacking autofs4 support in the kernel. You should fix this first.
Your udev in your initrd is a different version than on your system. You
should really fix that too.
/etc/mtab is not a symlink to /proc/mounts. Please fix.
Your systemd
2011/5/9 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Mon, 09.05.11 23:31, Karel Zak (k...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:45:51PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
2011/4/3 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 03.04.11 23:28, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Scott James Remnant sc...@netsplit.comwrote:
Thanks for your answers so far, I haven't had a chance to fully read and
digest them yet, but will do so before replying on those threads (if I even
need to, it's likely your responses are complete in of themselves).
On Mon, 09.05.11 13:13, Scott James Remnant (sc...@netsplit.com) wrote:
The System Daemon seems to be where systemd is much more clever; a Bluetooth
device unit would want the System Daemon, but that could be joined with
socket/D-Bus Activation right? So the presence of the device creates the
On Mon, 09.05.11 19:27, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
wrote:
So I was curious how these problems would be solved in the systemd world?
Reading through the documentation I came up with the following:
The Kernel Driver is still going to get loaded regardless, because
On Fri, 06.05.11 09:19, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
This commit consists of the initial work to include Angstrom as a ported
distribution for systemd.
Angstrom tries to follow the debian way as much as possible, but deviates
where it doesn't make sense for 'embedded'.
于 2011年05月10日 03:51, Koen Kooi 写道:
Op 9 mei 2011, om 21:43 heeft Lennart Poettering het volgende geschreven:
On Mon, 09.05.11 11:53, Scott James Remnant (sc...@netsplit.com) wrote:
Another question I wasn't able to find an answer to in the documentation
I've read so far.
The use of
31 matches
Mail list logo
