On Tue, 11.09.12 12:06, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
From 0a3f3b2a46607a94efd2936ae7094a9ef7421e76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:14:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Try to start rescue.target if default.target is missing
In
On Mon, 03.09.12 23:46, Colin Guthrie (co...@mageia.org) wrote:
Hi,
Heya,
OK, so these are the changes I'd propose to fix the issues mentioned
in this thread. I've not tested them so this is more for general
feedback as to whether this approach is generally a good one or not.
The
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 12/09/12 07:34 did gyre and gimble:
On Mon, 03.09.12 23:46, Colin Guthrie (co...@mageia.org) wrote:
Hi,
Heya,
OK, so these are the changes I'd propose to fix the issues mentioned
in this thread. I've not tested them so this is more for general
On 09/11/2012 05:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 24.08.12 16:22, Kir Kolyshkin (k...@openvz.org) wrote:
Proper handling of reboot() syscall issued from the inside of a container
was always supported by OpenVZ kernels. More to say, OpenVZ relies on the fact
that container calls reboot
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:47:48PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
On 09/11/2012 05:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 24.08.12 16:22, Kir Kolyshkin (k...@openvz.org) wrote:
Proper handling of reboot() syscall issued from the inside of a container
was always supported by OpenVZ kernels.
Introduced in d4e9eb91.
---
Sorry Lennart, I should have pointed this out along with my nudging last night
on IRC about the prior patch.
src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c b/src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c
index 70de06b..ed51ec8 100644
On Wed, 12.09.12 14:47, Kir Kolyshkin (k...@openvz.org) wrote:
This patch brings the reboot() back for OpenVZ container.
Turns out the normal Linux containers understand reboot() just fine
too.
Please note though that the problem with reboot() wrt upstream containers
was really nasty --
On Wed, 12.09.12 11:51, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:47:48PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
On 09/11/2012 05:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 24.08.12 16:22, Kir Kolyshkin (k...@openvz.org) wrote:
Proper handling of reboot() syscall
On Wed, 12.09.12 16:21, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote:
Introduced in d4e9eb91.
---
Sorry Lennart, I should have pointed this out along with my nudging last night
on IRC about the prior patch.
Applied! Thanks!
src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 12.09.12 11:51, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
NB when libvirt starts an LXC container, it first checks to see whether
the kernel has the container aware reboot() support. If it does
On Thu, 13.09.12 00:25, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 12.09.12 11:51, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
NB when libvirt starts an LXC container, it first checks to see whether
11 matches
Mail list logo
