On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:41 AM, har...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
Instead of using local-fs*.target in the initrd, use root-fs.target for
sysroot.mount and initrd-fs.target for /sysroot/usr and friends.
Using local-fs.target would mean to carry over the
Am 13.03.2013 09:06, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:41 AM, har...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
Instead of using local-fs*.target in the initrd, use root-fs.target for
sysroot.mount and initrd-fs.target for /sysroot/usr and friends.
Using
Am 08.03.2013 10:50, schrieb har...@redhat.com:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
---
src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup-generator.c | 209
+++---
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
pushed
___
This looks good. However, how do you deal with btrfs? Instal a fake fsck?
On Mar 8, 2013 2:14 AM, har...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
---
src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Am 13.03.2013 09:53, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
This looks good. However, how do you deal with btrfs? Instal a fake fsck?
that is no problem, as systemd-fsck just skips btrfs because of the missing
fsck.btrfs
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Mar 13, 2013 5:55 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 13.03.2013 09:53, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
This looks good. However, how do you deal with btrfs? Instal a fake
fsck?
that is no problem, as systemd-fsck just skips btrfs because of the
missing
fsck.btrfs
Ah, great! My brain
No need to try to stop systemd-sysctl on shutdown as
this service doesn't have ExecStop= anyways.
---
units/systemd-sysctl.service.in |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/units/systemd-sysctl.service.in b/units/systemd-sysctl.service.in
index 45e1ceb..d914553
'Twas brillig, and Canek Peláez Valdés at 13/03/13 03:40 did gyre and
gimble:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:25:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 10.03.13 11:29, Canek Peláez Valdés (can...@gmail.com)
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Andrey Wagin ava...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/13 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Andrey Wagin ava...@gmail.com wrote:
According to netlink(7) nl_groups is a bit mask with every bit
representing
a netlink group number.
Netlink
Hi,
As I'm doing some initrd-less experiments of late I'm seeing an ugly
fsck message pop up on boot.
In systemd-fsck-root.service I see:
StandardOutput=journal+console
which results in:
systemd-fsck[116]: /dev/sda2: clean, 435608/1310720 files,
3375994/5242112 blocks
being output over the
Good morning, I am trying to get LXC guests working with systemd. I am
at the point where I can start a container but it is affecting the host.
I've been discussing over on lxc-users and it's been suggested that
systemd may be incorrectly mounting devpts without the newinstance
option. I
Try adding lxc.mount option into container config using following
mount point file:
sysfs sys sysfs ro,defaults 0 0
proc proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
/proc/sys ${rootfs_path}/proc/sys none ro,bind 0 0
2013/3/13 John Lane syst...@jelmail.com:
Good morning, I am trying to get LXC guests
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
As I'm doing some initrd-less experiments of late I'm seeing an ugly
fsck message pop up on boot.
In systemd-fsck-root.service I see:
StandardOutput=journal+console
which results in:
systemd-fsck[116]: /dev/sda2:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:38 AM, John Lane syst...@jelmail.com wrote:
Good morning, I am trying to get LXC guests working with systemd. I am at
the point where I can start a container but it is affecting the host. I've
been discussing over on lxc-users and it's been suggested that systemd may
On 13/03/13 11:58, Kay Sievers wrote:
On the host, newinstance is not strictly needed, it is useful inside
the container though.
How do I make it use newinstance inside the container? is that a lxc
config or systemd?
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:32 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
On 13/03/13 11:58, Kay Sievers wrote:
On the host, newinstance is not strictly needed, it is useful inside the
container though.
How do I make it use newinstance inside the container? is that a lxc config
or systemd?
It's lxc's
2013/3/13 John l...@jelmail.com:
On 13/03/13 11:58, Kay Sievers wrote:
On the host, newinstance is not strictly needed, it is useful inside the
container though.
How do I make it use newinstance inside the container? is that a lxc config
or systemd?
lxc does this explicitly during container
'Twas brillig, and Kay Sievers at 13/03/13 11:50 did gyre and gimble:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
As I'm doing some initrd-less experiments of late I'm seeing an ugly
fsck message pop up on boot.
In systemd-fsck-root.service I see:
Am 13.03.2013 15:06, schrieb Colin Guthrie:
'Twas brillig, and Kay Sievers at 13/03/13 11:50 did gyre and gimble:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
As I'm doing some initrd-less experiments of late I'm seeing an ugly
fsck message pop up on boot.
In
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
so and what are you guys saying if i explain you that
i WANT THIS MESSAGES bedcause I WANT to SEE
/dev/sda2: clean, 435608/1310720 files
Now, that you ask, I would say: I don't care. :)
Kay
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:22:34AM -0700, Michal Schmidt wrote:
src/core/manager.c | 28 +++-
src/core/mount.c | 48 --
src/core/service.c | 60
-
src/core/socket.c |
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
so and what are you guys saying if i explain you that
i WANT THIS MESSAGES bedcause I WANT to SEE
/dev/sda2: clean, 435608/1310720 files
Now, that you
Am 13.03.2013 18:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2013 17:44, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H
auke-jan.h@intel.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013, Kay Sievers
'Twas brillig, and Reindl Harald at 13/03/13 17:37 did gyre and gimble:
Am 13.03.2013 17:44, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H
auke-jan.h@intel.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:17 PM,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:47:32AM +0200, Albert Strasheim wrote:
Hello all
We have some systems running systemd-37-25.fc16.x86_64.
We have an issue where a timer unit doesn't fire again if its service
runs for too long.
For the sake of mailing list archives:
this is not fixed yet, but the
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 06:22:57PM +0100, Michal Sekletar wrote:
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi,
Colin Walters wrote
install-directories-hook:
$(MKDIR_P) $(addprefix $(DESTDIR),$(INSTALL_DIRS))
+ $(MKDIR_P) -m 000 $(addprefix $(DESTDIR),$(INACCESSIBLE_DIR))
Ugh. Can you make this /run/systemd/inaccessible or something, and
have systemd do this at runtime?
Having
Check all errors. Return the first error if looping.
---
Hi Nathaniel,
your patches duplicate the same code paths (within one function!).
Also, if cipsco is not available, a warning would be printed, which
we don't want.
Can you check if the following two replacement patches work for you?
Please
28 matches
Mail list logo
