This is not the solution we need. :-(
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
greetings
I am learning to use systeMD.
my computing machine has these:-
--cpu- -amd64
--os blfsLinux linux-3.11.6, systemd-204 ( I think).
I have created some systeMD service files for programs (call a typical one
noise.service') and I placed then in say /path/to/bang.
Now I want to
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:39:19PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 06.11.13 11:18, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
Type x in tmpfiles configuration accepts shell style globs instead of normal
paths. If user uses normal path he might expect that the path will be left
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 08.11.13 10:34, Marc-Antoine Perennou (marc-anto...@perennou.com)
wrote:
Heya!
I already rebased the previous version you posted, and then applied with
some changes. Is this reposting of yours more than just a rebase?
I
From: David Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net
---
src/core/cgroup.c | 7 ++-
src/core/cgroup.h | 2 ++
src/core/unit.c | 2 ++
src/core/unit.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/core/cgroup.c b/src/core/cgroup.c
index 6a6c504..81255ea 100644
---
On Fri, 08.11.13 10:34, Marc-Antoine Perennou (marc-anto...@perennou.com) wrote:
Heya!
I already rebased the previous version you posted, and then applied with
some changes. Is this reposting of yours more than just a rebase?
I merged both commits into one, and made a couple of changes:
I
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:39:19PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 06.11.13 11:18, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
Type x in tmpfiles configuration accepts shell style globs instead of normal
paths. If user uses normal path he might expect that the path will be left
Admin-created service files should go in /etc/systemd/system/. You
manage them using systemctl and the name of the service file *with no
path*.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi folks,
Forgive me in advance if the underlying reasonings behind these
questions are a bit naive...
Will kdbus make use of polkit? If partially so, will it be feasible to
have a normal desktop system with systemd+kdbus that does not require
polkit? Will polkit play a smaller role going
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 01:27:46AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Hi folks,
Forgive me in advance if the underlying reasonings behind these
questions are a bit naive...
What are those underlying reasonings?
Will kdbus make use of polkit? If partially so, will it be feasible to
have a
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 01:27:46AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Forgive me in advance if the underlying reasonings behind these
questions are a bit naive...
What are those underlying reasonings?
Will kdbus make
11 matches
Mail list logo