Le vendredi 21 février 2014 à 03:48 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Thu, 20.02.14 16:19, m...@zarb.org (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
From: Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org
This permit to switch to a specific apparmor profile when starting a
daemon. This
will result in a non operation
Am 21.02.2014 04:41, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:00:10AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
systemd-networkd seems to get started by default in 209. Why is this?
What if I don't want to use it to manage my networks? Why does it have
to be on by default?
I
Hi,
Michael Scherer wrote (21 Feb 2014 08:39:12 GMT) :
Le vendredi 21 février 2014 à 03:48 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
I don't have any apparmor available though. Could you check if
everything works correctly?
I will, I do have a opensuse VM for that, and I think intrigeri in CC,
Am 20.02.2014 17:33, schrieb Dave Reisner:
Hi all,
I'm working on packaging the systemd 209 release, and I expect to have
pkgrel=1 into [testing] in a few hours, barring any unforseen problems.
It's a huge release (nearly 2000 commits since 208), and I don't
anticipate that this will make
I agree with Harald.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
There was a copy-paste error introduced in commit
c2ba3ad6604ef2e189d7e0a36d696e84d3ab
which causes the following error when using timer units:
Assertion '(x-type == SOURCE_MONOTONIC y-type == SOURCE_MONOTONIC) ||
(x-type == SOURCE_REALTIME y-type == SOURCE_REALTIME)'
failed at
Both systemd-analyze and systemd-run only access org.freedesktop.systemd1
on the bus. This patch allows using systemd-run --user and systemd-analyze
--user even if the user session's bus is not properly integrated with the
systemd user unit.
---
src/analyze/analyze.c | 2 +-
src/run/run.c
On 21 Feb 2014 03:22, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 20.02.14 21:04, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com)
wrote:
Tom commited this. Thanks!
Tom, please always do a quick reply on the ML so that it is easy to see
what is commited and what is not!
Sorry
On Fri, 21.02.14 04:38, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
systemd-network.service should not be started unless the administrator
runs systemctl enable systemd-network.service, as it's entirely
unessential and most distributions use their own network management
daemons instead. If
On Fri, 21.02.14 08:28, Holger Schurig (holgerschu...@gmail.com) wrote:
Compilation works okay here. And make check said PASS: test-namespace.
The change I made is to complain if __NR_setns is not defined.
The approach with an error message (at runtime) was taken from
iproute2. I used
On Fri, 21.02.14 09:39, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
Applied! I made some changes though, there were some missing
bits to make sure the config hookup works correctly. I don't have any
apparmor available though. Could you check if everything works
correctly?
I will, I do have
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 21.02.14 04:38, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
systemd-network.service should not be started unless the administrator
runs systemctl enable systemd-network.service, as it's entirely
On Fri, 21.02.14 11:20, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
There was a copy-paste error introduced in commit
c2ba3ad6604ef2e189d7e0a36d696e84d3ab
which causes the following error when using timer units:
Assertion '(x-type == SOURCE_MONOTONIC y-type == SOURCE_MONOTONIC) ||
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
Hey guys,
This commit caught me by surprise:
http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8
It wasn't in the NEWS or the mailing list post for 209, so when
updating I
Previously we put the boot offset and boot ID into the completion, now
we use something similar to the coredumpctl completion, but only with
the boot offsets.
---
This is just something I'm working on, but would like some input. I'm fine
with it not having the boot ID's output, but that may be
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
Hey guys,
This commit caught me by surprise:
http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8
It wasn't in
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
I'll just apply this patch and
add the /etc symlink in a follow-up.
I appreciate merging my patch, so now administrators can disable it in
a sane way (without having to use mask). But still, why enable it by
default? I thought
---
configure.ac | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 80c1449..8943c96 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1150,6 +1150,7 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT([
hostnamed: ${have_hostnamed}
timedated:
By passing --rootprefix= you can get systemd-udevd installed to
/lib/systemd, as opposed to /usr/lib/systemd
And by logic, network configuration is needed to accompany the daemon
since /usr might not be mounted yet,
the network configuration needs to go to same prefix with the systemd-udevd
This reverts commit ca1a3847695d02ebe62007d8f335f23d3fe04638.
It's not right to install this by default. networkd is extremely new,
has no real world miles, and most importantly, simply
does-not-do-anything-at-all unless you write configuration files for it.
So, for folks who want to use
On Fri, 21.02.14 15:03, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
I'll just apply this patch and
add the /etc symlink in a follow-up.
I appreciate merging my patch, so now administrators can disable it in
a sane way
On Fri, 21.02.14 15:54, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
Fix problems with unresolved symbols when building on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64.
--8---cut here---start-8---
./.libs/libudev.so: undefined reference to `__res_search'
./.libs/libudev.so:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
By passing --rootprefix= you can get systemd-udevd installed to
/lib/systemd, as opposed to /usr/lib/systemd
And by logic, network configuration is needed to accompany the daemon
since /usr might not be mounted yet,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Well, ultimately it's up the distributions to decide what they want to
enable and what not.
True, but this requires manual patching and fixing up of `make
install`, which is a bummer.
I think networkd is a good
It doesn't make any sense to symlink this unit file into /etc when the
unit file itself isn't even installed, with --disable-networkd. This
moves the GENERAL_ALIASES logic into the right if block.
---
Makefile.am | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am
2014-02-21 16:31 GMT+01:00 Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Well, ultimately it's up the distributions to decide what they want to
enable and what not.
True, but this requires manual patching and fixing up
'Twas brillig, and Reindl Harald at 21/02/14 08:45 did gyre and gimble:
Am 21.02.2014 04:41, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:00:10AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
systemd-networkd seems to get started by default in 209. Why is this?
What if I don't want
Am 21.02.2014 16:44, schrieb Colin Guthrie:
'Twas brillig, and Reindl Harald at 21/02/14 08:45 did gyre and gimble:
Am 21.02.2014 04:41, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:00:10AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
systemd-networkd seems to get started by default
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
It doesn't make any sense to symlink this unit file into /etc when the
unit file itself isn't even installed, with --disable-networkd. This
moves the GENERAL_ALIASES logic into the right if block.
Applied. Thanks!
It was 2014-02-21 pią 16:22, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 21.02.14 15:54, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
Fix problems with unresolved symbols when building on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64.
--8---cut here---start-8---
./.libs/libudev.so:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-02-21 16:31 GMT+01:00 Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Well, ultimately it's up the distributions to decide what they want to
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Łukasz Stelmach l.stelm...@samsung.com wrote:
It was 2014-02-21 pią 16:22, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 21.02.14 15:54, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
Fix problems with unresolved symbols when building on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64.
On 21/02/14 17:37, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 21/02/14 13:58 did
gyre and gimble:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
Hey guys,
This commit
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Well, ultimately it's up the distributions to decide what they want to
enable and what not.
True, but this requires manual patching
To clarify things:
1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules
2. freedesktop.org wiki followed suit and added that suggestion
3. Others have said elsewhere that the proper way to do this is
actually to override 99-default.link instead.
4. Gentoo went with number 3.
Now:
5. Can numbers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
We'd have to look in all the possible folders, and there may (and due
to 99-deafult.link, always will) be files there, so we don't really
have a
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
In the not-too-distant future we'll start shipping some configuration
files (as Lennart mentioned to do with nspawn). These are files that
in most cases will not apply, and shouldn't interfere with your
existing networking
On Fri, 21.02.14 16:31, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Well, ultimately it's up the distributions to decide what they want to
enable and what not.
True, but this requires manual patching
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
You probably sent this before reading my previous answer, so sorry for
repeating myself: there will soon be cases where (special purpose)
config files are shipped by packages rather than written by
administrators, which is what
On Fri, 21.02.14 17:14, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
In the not-too-distant future we'll start shipping some configuration
files (as Lennart mentioned to do with nspawn). These are files that
in most
Am 21.02.2014 17:03, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
What about Zbigniews idea of using something like:
ConditionDirectoryNotEmpty=/etc/systemd/network/
Would that work?
We'd have to look in all the possible folders, and there may (and due
to 99-deafult.link, always will) be files there, so we
On Fri, 21.02.14 15:44, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Reindl Harald at 21/02/14 08:45 did gyre and gimble:
Am 21.02.2014 04:41, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:00:10AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
systemd-networkd
Prior to 3.2, /proc/sys/kernel/hostname isn't a pollable file and
sd_event_add_io will return EPERM. Ignore this failure, since it isn't
critical to journald operation.
---
Reported and tested by user sraue on IRC.
src/journal/journald-server.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff
True, but this requires manual patching and fixing up of `make
install`, which is a bummer.
Why?
Your debian/rules or rpmspec %build can simply do something like this:
make install
rm -f ${DEST}/etc/systemd/system/FOOO.BAR
that is much easier than quilt patches that modify
On Fri, 21.02.14 16:51, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Well I kinda get that using it for containers and such like could be
useful, but I also suspect it should be bus or socket activated rather
than statically enabled... like localed, datetimed etc. Any reason to
enable it
It was backward - --after fetches After property, so units shown really
come *before* unit given as argument. Same for --before.
---
man/systemctl.xml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/systemctl.xml b/man/systemctl.xml
index 355cd11..fef9578 100644
---
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:22:50AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
Prior to 3.2, /proc/sys/kernel/hostname isn't a pollable file and
sd_event_add_io will return EPERM. Ignore this failure, since it isn't
critical to journald operation.
---
Reported and tested by user sraue on IRC.
This should
It was 2014-02-21 pią 17:06, when Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Łukasz Stelmach l.stelm...@samsung.com
wrote:
It was 2014-02-21 pią 16:22, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 21.02.14 15:54, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
Fix problems with
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:22:50AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
Prior to 3.2, /proc/sys/kernel/hostname isn't a pollable file and
sd_event_add_io will return EPERM. Ignore this failure, since it isn't
critical to
Greetings
What are the current plans for Infiniband network (IPoIB) support in
networkd?
JBG
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:23:25PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Greetings
What are the current plans for Infiniband network (IPoIB) support in networkd?
Why wouldn't it just work today? Have you tried it? If so, what is
missing?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Thu, 20.02.14 23:25, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
Dear systemd folks,
Docker, “an open-source project to easily create lightweight, portable,
self-sufficient containers from any application”, [1] mostly recommends
to use Supervisor [2] to control the processes
On 02/21/2014 06:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:23:25PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Greetings
What are the current plans for Infiniband network (IPoIB) support in networkd?
Why wouldn't it just work today? Have you tried it? If so, what is
missing?
Nope not tried
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 07:25:50PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/21/2014 06:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:23:25PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Greetings
What are the current plans for Infiniband network (IPoIB) support in
networkd?
Why wouldn't it
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen pho...@gmail.com
---
Not too sure about the bridge - netdev change. It just seemed a strange to read
since we set the type a bit later to be either bridge, bond, or vlan.
man/systemd-networkd.service.xml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen pho...@gmail.com
---
Not too sure about the bridge - netdev change. It just seemed a strange to
read
since we set the type a bit later to be either bridge, bond, or vlan.
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen pho...@gmail.com
Add:
--system
-H --host
-M --machine
--service-type (options: simple forking oneshot dbus notify idle)
--uid
--gid
--nice
--setenv
---
The last 5 are not documented in the man page. The options for --service-type
are my guess. Please review.
El 18/02/14 11:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek escribió:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:56:36AM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
SECCOMP_CFLAGS must be in the global CFLAGS as seccomp.h is
included in core/execute.h. when seccomp.h is not in the standard
path.(i.e openSUSE has it in
58 matches
Mail list logo
