Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] kdbus: allow multiple policies

2014-08-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On 31/07/14 21:38, Kay Sievers wrote: We have one .busname file per name and it will get really complicated to start stop a busname, when it has multiple names per connection. We should really avoid that and require one connection per name and allow only name. I might be misunderstanding what

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] kdbus: allow multiple policies

2014-08-01 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote: On 31/07/14 21:38, Kay Sievers wrote: We have one .busname file per name and it will get really complicated to start stop a busname, when it has multiple names per connection. We should really avoid that and

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] kdbus: allow multiple policies

2014-08-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On 01/08/14 12:20, Kay Sievers wrote: On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote: are you saying that under kdbus, each connection to the bus [...] is only allowed to own one well-known name (thing like org.freedesktop.systemd1)? No, it is not about

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] kdbus: allow multiple policies

2014-08-01 Thread Djalal Harouni
Hi, On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:38:47PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote: (Cc'ed Lennart) On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:40:53PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 06/11] There is no ANSI support on common 3215 consoles

2014-08-01 Thread Dr. Werner Fink
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Also, we are not going to add code for any specific weird terminal settings. We will do three levels: TERM=linux for the full Linux console, TERM=vt102 otherwise, and TERM=dumb for the crap that can't do TERM=vt102. But we

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 06/11] There is no ANSI support on common 3215 consoles

2014-08-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 01.08.14 16:07, Dr. Werner Fink (wer...@suse.de) wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Also, we are not going to add code for any specific weird terminal settings. We will do three levels: TERM=linux for the full Linux console, TERM=vt102

[systemd-devel] [patch] #include src/shared/missing.h in src/shared/util.h for missing struct file_handle definition

2014-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Mike Frysinger pointed out util.h is using a struct defined in missing.h but doesn't #include it: util.h has: union file_handle_union { struct file_handle handle; char padding[sizeof(struct file_handle) + MAX_HANDLE_SZ]; }; missing.h has: #if !HAVE_DECL_NAME_TO_HANDLE_AT struct

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] #include src/shared/missing.h in src/shared/util.h for missing struct file_handle definition

2014-08-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On 01/08/14 15:43, Samuli Suominen wrote: Please, #include missing.h in src/shared/util.h to fix the build for old systems w/ no system header defining the struct I ran into the same thing on a slightly odd system (Debian 7 with a backported kernel, so it has Linux 3.14 but only glibc 2.13)

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] #include src/shared/missing.h in src/shared/util.h for missing struct file_handle definition

2014-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 01/08/14 17:53, Simon McVittie wrote: On 01/08/14 15:43, Samuli Suominen wrote: Please, #include missing.h in src/shared/util.h to fix the build for old systems w/ no system header defining the struct I ran into the same thing on a slightly odd system (Debian 7 with a backported kernel,

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] #include src/shared/missing.h in src/shared/util.h for missing struct file_handle definition

2014-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 01/08/14 18:31, Simon McVittie wrote: On 01/08/14 15:53, Simon McVittie wrote: Best-practice in Autotools projects seems to be to include config.h at the very top of every .c file, whether it is currently needed or not. Sorry, I'd missed that systemd uses cc -include

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] #include src/shared/missing.h in src/shared/util.h for missing struct file_handle definition

2014-08-01 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 01/08/14 18:31, Simon McVittie wrote: On 01/08/14 15:53, Simon McVittie wrote: Best-practice in Autotools projects seems to be to include config.h at the very top of every .c file, whether it is currently needed or not.