On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:37:14PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:12:30PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Hi-
I'd like to write a generic udev rule for U2F security tokens and to
possibly
Hello Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2014-10-27 16:09 +0100]:
+static const char hwdb_bin_paths[] =
+/etc/udev/hwdb.bin\0
+UDEVLIBEXECDIR /hwdb.bin\0;
+
+
+static int open_hwdb_bin(const char **path, FILE** f) {
+const char* p;
+
+NULSTR_FOREACH(p,
On Tue, 28.10.14 03:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 02:32:37AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 27.10.14 23:07, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Mon, 27.10.14 20:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi all,
I've been assigned the task to introduce systemd to my sysadmin
collegues, as it will be adopted by CentOS and Debian nextcoming releases.
Debian+CentOS is 90% of our machines, the remaining 10% is negligeable.
Would you have some bookmarks of some slide presenting systemd?
Espacially
On Tue, 28.10.14 12:09, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
The AccuracySec= and WakeSystem= stuff I think we don't need to cover
with a command line argument of its own, we can cover that with
--property=.
Rework is almost done. Now I'm testing. But the AccuracySec= and
On Tue, 28.10.14 09:53, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2014-10-27 16:09 +0100]:
+static const char hwdb_bin_paths[] =
+/etc/udev/hwdb.bin\0
+UDEVLIBEXECDIR /hwdb.bin\0;
+
+
+static int open_hwdb_bin(const char **path,
Hi Mihamina,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org wrote:
Would you have some bookmarks of some slide presenting systemd?
We try to gather all such resources here:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/.
HTH,
Tom
Hello Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2014-10-28 11:31 +0100]:
I'd prefer if you'd move the log message for the error into
open_hwdb_bin() then, so that it is not the caller, but the callee
which prints the error message in this case.
That would then mean to move most of udev_hwdb_new() into
On Thu, 23.10.14 16:39, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, I think the generator should already treat the option fields the
same way as I want it to work in the long run, i.e. just read it from
fstab and write it 1:1 into the unit's Options= string.
I am hacking up
On 10/28/2014 07:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 28.10.14 12:09, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
The AccuracySec= and WakeSystem= stuff I think we don't need to cover
with a command line argument of its own, we can cover that with
--property=.
Rework is almost done.
Hello,
I need suggestion on a case 01270671, where customer is getting weird
characters as below :
Can some one suggest what is wrong?
Weird characters when displaying man pages on RHEL 7.0
e.g. man firewall-cmd
ample 2
Enable port 443/tcp immediately and
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:56:32AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
Good time of day, list.
I try to fix Fixme in svg.c:
/* FIXME: this works only in the simple case */
By default function try to get only root=/dev/*
I also attach patch. Thanks.
v2:
Rewrited with use
From memory that's pretty standard with vt100 emulation, I always noticed it in
man pages .. have they tried setting TERM to xterm?
- Original Message -
From: Manish Saxena msax...@redhat.com
To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Red Hat Technical Discussion List
On 28/10/14 10:06, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
what to do if
there is the need to package a daemon and there is only a SysV init
script available
LSB init scripts should continue to work fine. Make sure they have LSB
pseudo-headers (Required-Start etc.) for their dependencies.
if running
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Manish Saxena msax...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I need suggestion on a case 01270671, where customer is getting weird
characters as below :
Can some one suggest what is wrong?
Weird characters when displaying man pages on RHEL 7.0
Thanks everyone, actually customer was using some third party software to
access the terminal which they confirmed now. and they are not facing any issue
while using console or ssh.
Thanks for help and sorry for noise.
Regards,
Manish
- Original Message -
From: Morgan Weetman
On Tue, 28.10.14 21:17, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
On 10/28/2014 07:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 28.10.14 12:09, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
The AccuracySec= and WakeSystem= stuff I think we don't need to cover
with a command line argument
On Tue, 28.10.14 12:18, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Checked with Kay, he's fine with this. Please commit!
Thanks,
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Fri, 24.10.14 21:15, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
Thanks! Applied!
---
src/core/dbus-job.c | 2 +-
src/core/dbus-manager.c | 68
+++
src/core/dbus-snapshot.c | 2 +-
src/core/dbus-unit.c | 8 +++---
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:50:05AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 28.10.14 03:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 02:32:37AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 27.10.14 23:07, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 26.10.14 05:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73942
So in really old systemd versions I had a concept in place of never
printing to the console
On Tue, 28.10.14 15:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 26.10.14 05:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73942
So
if sigabrt doesn't do the job, follow regular shutdown
routine, sigterm sigkill.
Umut:
- I have done basic testing with suppressing sigabrt,
suppressing both sigabrt sigterm on client application.
- Documentation needs to be updated. I wasn't sure if we
should mention it in KillMode,
On Tue, 28.10.14 13:14, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Thu, 23.10.14 16:39, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, I think the generator should already treat the option fields the
same way as I want it to work in the long run, i.e. just read
On Tue, 28.10.14 15:34, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
if sigabrt doesn't do the job, follow regular shutdown
routine, sigterm sigkill.
Umut:
- I have done basic testing with suppressing sigabrt,
suppressing both sigabrt sigterm on client application.
-
---
NEWS | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index c5f0db2..f4afcf6 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ CHANGES WITH 217:
* Udev rules can now remove tags on devices with TAG-=foobar.
* systemd's readahead
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Ronny Chevalier
chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
---
NEWS | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index c5f0db2..f4afcf6 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ CHANGES WITH 217:
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
That mostly applies to people who actually don't use systemd and are
commenting from the peanut gallery. Actual *users* when they are unhappy
are unhappy about bugs.
That is not entirely true. I'm a user (because systemd is in Fedora
19),
On 28/10/14 16:28, Dale R. Worley wrote:
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
That mostly applies to people who actually don't use systemd and are
commenting from the peanut gallery. Actual *users* when they are unhappy
are unhappy about bugs.
That is not entirely true. I'm
if sigabrt doesn't do the job, follow regular shutdown
routine, sigterm sigkill.
---
TODO| 2 --
man/systemd.service.xml | 5 +++--
src/core/busname.c | 2 +-
src/core/mount.c| 3 ++-
src/core/scope.c| 2 +-
src/core/service.c | 37
On Tue, 28.10.14 11:28, Dale R. Worley (wor...@alum.mit.edu) wrote:
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
That mostly applies to people who actually don't use systemd and are
commenting from the peanut gallery. Actual *users* when they are unhappy
are unhappy about bugs.
On Oct 28, 2014 5:05 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Tue, 28.10.14 11:28, Dale R. Worley (wor...@alum.mit.edu) wrote:
That is not entirely true. I'm a user (because systemd is in Fedora
19), and I've complained that if I mark an /etc/fstab entry as
nofail, some part
Lennart Poettering wrote on 27/10/14 18:11:
On Thu, 23.10.14 17:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
order it after basic.target (which things are by default anyway)...
My proposal now, (which is the same Damien's as I understood him):
1. pam_systemd should sync on
Hi,
It seems we have different permissions for /etc/{g}shadow than fedora.
We don't package it as ,root,root but rather 0440,root,shadow.
We can then run some tools that need direct access as setgid rather than
full blown setuid. I'm not totally convinced of the security benefits
here (and I
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:37:14PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:12:30PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Hi-
I'd
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:16:38PM +0100, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote:
On Oct 28, 2014 5:05 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Tue, 28.10.14 11:28, Dale R. Worley (wor...@alum.mit.edu) wrote:
That is not entirely true. I'm a user (because systemd is in Fedora
19),
On 28/10/14 16:34, Colin Guthrie wrote:
It seems we have different permissions for /etc/{g}shadow than fedora.
We don't package it as ,root,root but rather 0440,root,shadow.
Who is we? Mageia? FYI, Debian uses 0640 root:shadow for the same files.
We can then run some tools that need
On Tue, 28.10.14 16:35, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
Applied! Thanks!
if sigabrt doesn't do the job, follow regular shutdown
routine, sigterm sigkill.
---
TODO| 2 --
man/systemd.service.xml | 5 +++--
src/core/busname.c | 2 +-
Is this the best way to start Oracle?
[root@localhost system]# cat oracle-foo.service
[Unit]
Description=oracle db - foo
After=syslog.target
[Service]
Environment=ORACLE_SID=foo ORACLE_HOME=/home/oracle/Ora12c/db
ExecStart=/bin/ksh -c 'print connect / as sysdba \n startup \n quit |
On 10/28/2014 07:08 PM, Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon) wrote:
Is this the best way to start Oracle?
No and unfortunately for you Oracle is not open source and has a bad
track record taking code submissions which is probably why nobody has
written a proper systemd unit for it and pushed
El mar, 28-10-2014 a las 17:05 +0100, Lennart Poettering escribió:
[...]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-October/024325.html
Looks interesting. Have you think in having some kind of wiki or page
listing this kind of tricks to solve things like that. That way we
prevent
Interestingly, placing the Oracle database listener in its own service
propagates this cgroup to all client connections into all databases.
Stopping the listener service kills these connections for all instances handled
by the listener, which is not the normal/expected behavior.
So far, hidraw_id detects U2F tokens and sets:
ID_U2F_TOKEN=1
ID_SECURITY_TOKEN=1
This causes the uaccess rules to apply to U2F devices.
---
I've never written any udev code before. Feedback welcome.
If you think this doesn't belong in udev, I can try to find it another home.
.gitignore
Hi, I'm going on with my work to have systemd in initrd on NixOS (using
dracut is a little complicated at the moment).
Everything works fine, I've ported luks and lvm and both work separately.
However I'm hitting a problem when using luks and lvm on top of luks.
SETUP
Software: systemd 212, lvm
A recent commit (2f3a215) changed the parsing of /proc/cmdline to use a
shell array. Unfortunately, this introduced a bug: read -ar line
populates the shell variable $r, not $line. This breaks installation of
new loader entries:
# kernel-install add 3.17.1-304.fc21.x86_64 \
В Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:08:45 -0400
Fisher, Charles J. (Top Echelon) charles.fis...@alcoa.com пишет:
Is this the best way to start Oracle?
[root@localhost system]# cat oracle-foo.service
[Unit]
Description=oracle db - foo
After=syslog.target
[Service]
Environment=ORACLE_SID=foo
46 matches
Mail list logo
