On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 09:27:43PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 28.11.14 20:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:33:41PM -0800, Chris Leech wrote:
This adds auto detection for iSCSI and some FCoE drivers and treats
mounts to
Hello
Could you take a look at my patch?
Regards
Przemyslaw Kedzierski
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Tue, 25.11.14 10:01, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
I explicitly ignore errors from verify_xkb_rmlvo() and proceed.
libxkbcommon is still not 100% compatible to libxkb (and doesn't
intend to be that, I guess). As we write X11
Hello all,
In my efforts to make user LXC containers work I noticed that under a
real desktop (not just nspawn with VT login or ssh logins) my
carefully set up cgroups in the non-systemd controllers get reverted.
I. e. I put the session leader (and all other pids) of logind sessions
Hi,
On 01/12/2014 01:12, Lennart Poettering wrote :
On Mon, 24.11.14 19:25, Quentin Lefebvre (qlefebvre_...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Le 24/11/2014 19:17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:03:27PM +0100, Quentin Lefebvre wrote:
Le 24/11/2014 19:01, Zbigniew
On Mon, 01.12.14 14:54, Dave Chinner (da...@fromorbit.com) wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 01.12.14 01:41, Richard Weinberger (rich...@nod.at) wrote:
CC'ing systemd folks.
Lennart, can you please explain why you need
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:24:58AM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 09:27:43PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 28.11.14 20:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:33:41PM -0800, Chris Leech wrote:
This adds auto
Hi
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:48 AM, arnaud gaboury
arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote:
I only use some settings from mate desktop (clipboard, appearance...)
thus looking for a service file to start mate-settings-daemon.
/home/gabx/.config/systemd/user/mate-settings-daemon.service
Hi
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Ross Lagerwall
rosslagerw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On recent versions of systemd, unit_kill_context doesn't set
wait_for_exit to true which means that service_enter_signal sends
SIGTERM, immediately moves into stop-sigkill and sends SIGKILL, ignoring
On Friday 07 November 2014 at 16:45:02, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 07.11.14 17:45, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2014 at 11:02:44, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi Ray
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:40 AM, David Herrmann
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:28:33PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Wouldn't be enough to use Chris' iSCSI and FCoE auto detection?
Please see previous discussion... Detecting network might not be trivial
if the devices are layered and there's a network-requiring device somewhere
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
koc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. What about per-task/thread UUID? exported via separate file:
/proc/PID/uuid
It could be created at the first access, thus this wouldn't shlowdown clone().
Also it could be droped at execve(), so it'll
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov koc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
koc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. What about per-task/thread UUID? exported via separate
On Mon, 24.11.14 12:35, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
+static int is_on_temporary_fs(int fd) {
+struct statfs s;
+
+if (fstatfs(fd, s) 0)
+return -errno;
+
+return F_TYPE_EQUAL(s.f_type, TMPFS_MAGIC) ||
+
On Mon, 24.11.14 12:35, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
+static int get_valid_machine_id(int fd, char id[34]) {
+assert(fd = 0);
+assert(id);
+
+if (loop_read(fd, id, 33, false) == 33 id[32] == '\n') {
+id[32] = 0;
+
+
On Mon, 24.11.14 12:35, Didier Roche (didier.ro...@canonical.com) wrote:
This one looks flawless to me!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On Mon, 24.11.14 12:36, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
The last two look great too!
Thanks,
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On Mon, 01.12.14 17:25, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote:
To me it appears to be quite OK to be run inside a udev rule.
Well, maybe it is OK to be run from an udev rule, but it is still an
inconsistency between running that binary on boot (via a unit) and
running the same
On Wed, Nov 27, 2014 at 09:21:00AM -0500, Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
There were some fixes in this area. 3bfd4e0c6341b0ef946d2198f089743fa99e0a97
might fix the unbounded size.
Indeed, it does! Applying this change on top of the Debian jessie version of
v215 cleaned it right up on each
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:25:18AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 25.11.14 12:01, Thiago Macieira (thi...@kde.org) wrote:
[...]
=== KDBUS_ATTACH_NAMES ===
Documentation for metadata says that userspace must cope with some
metadata
not being delivered. Can we at
On Sun, 23.11.14 10:15, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
This patch introduces LLDP support to networkd. it implements the
receiver side of the protocol.
The Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) is an industry-standard,
vendor-neutral method to allow networked devices to advertise
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:17:18PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:15:10AM +0530, Susant Sahani wrote:
This patch integrates LLDP with networkd.
In Fedora, we already have LLDP
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sun, 23.11.14 10:15, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
This patch introduces LLDP support to networkd. it implements the
receiver side of the protocol.
The Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) is an
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:17:18PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:15:10AM +0530, Susant Sahani wrote:
This patch
Hello,
While converting from Upstart to SystemD, came upon this issue. Is this case
not covered or am I missing something?
In Upstart, I can start a job when another job fails, and there's a $JOB
variable that tells me what was the job that failed.
start on (stopped RESULT=failed
On Mon, 01.12.14 17:10, Nekrasov, Alexander (alexander.nekra...@emc.com) wrote:
Hello,
While converting from Upstart to SystemD, came upon this issue. Is this case
not covered or am I missing something?
In Upstart, I can start a job when another job fails, and there's a $JOB
variable
On Mon, 01.12.14 11:47, Przemyslaw Kedzierski (p.kedzier...@samsung.com) wrote:
Hello
Could you take a look at my patch?
Sorry for the delay, I have a huge backlog of unreviewed patches, and
am now working through them!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
On Thu, 13.11.14 18:11, Przemyslaw Kedzierski (p.kedzier...@samsung.com) wrote:
Looks pretty good, but I coudln't apply it. There's something wrong
with the patch the deletion/renaming of the service files doesn't
work. Did you create this patch with git-format-patch?
if (is_unix) {
On Thu, 20.11.14 09:13, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
~ I'm also getting this on every reload:
systemd[1]: [/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-journald.service:24] Failed to
parse capability in bounding set, ignoring: CAP_AUDIT_READ
I suppose I can ignore the message. I see
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Ross Lagerwall
rosslagerw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On recent versions of systemd, unit_kill_context doesn't set
wait_for_exit to true which means that service_enter_signal sends
SIGTERM, immediately moves into
On Wed, 19.11.14 18:20, Chunhui He (hchun...@mail.ustc.edu.cn) wrote:
systemd generates some timestamps before the very first call of
settimeofday().
When we are in rtc-in-local time mode, these timestamps are wrong.
Affected timestamps are:
Kernel, InitRD, Userspace, SecurityStart,
On Mon, 24.11.14 09:30, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
It was 2014-11-21 pią 21:36, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 21.11.14 17:07, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
On a system configured without networkd and sysusers there still needs
to be the
On Tue, 18.11.14 12:11, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Fedora doesn't enable and start all units on package installation: there are
some preset files, based on flavors, which is basically the policy stating
which units to enable/disable by default. Some other units are always
On Tue, 18.11.14 13:01, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
We can certainly ship a preset of enable * to reflect the policy
that in general services do get enabled by default. But this still
leaves some issues:
No need to ship enable *, btw. It's the implied default if no preset
file
On Tue, 18.11.14 14:40, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
Well the upstream blessed RPM way is to call %systemd_post macro in
your %post script, but (personally) I don't like this as it makes the
implementation very much embedded into the RPMs so changing the upstream
macro needs a
On Tue, 18.11.14 14:10, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
- We are mixing sys admin information and distro default choices in the same
directories, and can't tell apart what is what.
That is true. Could we perhaps improve on systemctl by printing
enabled (preset)/disable (preset) for
On Tue, 18.11.14 14:37, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
We now have:
enabeld - [Install] section and symlink in /etc/**/*.wants.d/
disabled - [Install] section and no symlink in /etc/**/*.wants.d/
static - no [Install] section and symlink in /usr/lib/**/*.wants.d/
masked -
On Tue, 18.11.14 16:09, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014-11-18 15:59 GMT+01:00 Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie:
Didier Roche wrote on 18/11/14 13:58:
This would be maybe a nice way for the admin to know what's coming from
a distribution default or not. However, let's say I
On Fri, 28.11.14 11:15, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
The distribution comes preinstalled with one dm, enable * - enable it, have
the Alias=display-manager.service picking the right one.
However, let's say the user installed then another dm, what happens? Both
will be enabled if
On Mon, 01.12.14 12:04, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
Thinking about it again, I don't think that it's a good idea to pass
those errors to the client...
A few examples:
# localectl set-x11-keymap QQ
Dec 01 12:02:06 fedora-rawhide-systemd-virt systemd-localed[877]:
On Sun, 23.11.14 12:34, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
В Fri, 21 Nov 2014 01:26:36 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net пишет:
On Thu, 20.11.14 19:56, Lukasz Stelmach (stl...@poczta.fm) wrote:
I talked to the kernel guys at my office and they told me that it
On Mon, 24.11.14 15:21, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
I now pushed something to -git, see:
commit d4f5a1f47dbd04f26f2ddf951c97c4cb0ebbbe62
Author: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Nov 24 15:12:42 2014 +0100
localed: validate xkb keymaps
On Mon, 24.11.14 13:31, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Fri, 14.11.14 12:42, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
+if (look_for == LAYOUTS) {
+Set *s;
+char *k;
+
On Wed, 19.11.14 20:05, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
В Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:25:43 +
Cao, XinX xinx@intel.com пишет:
Hi, Umut David,
My project needs the Graphical desktop to display on monitor as fast as
possible, but I found lots of unrelated
On Mon, 17.11.14 12:31, Rui Miguel Silva (rmf...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
- technical debt, if in the future the filter mechanism is change by
other than bloom.
so bloom maybe just be replaced with only generic filter could make more
sense?
What do you mean by only
45 matches
Mail list logo
