Hello,
I don't quite understand this:
$ systemctl --user status autocommit-org.service
● autocommit-org.service - Auto-commits changes to orgmode files.
Loaded: loaded (/home/nikratio/.config/systemd/user/autocommit-org.service;
static)
Active: inactive (dead) since Wed 2015-04-15
I asked the following on freedesktop list a month ago and got no response. As
there was quite some time between this showing up in Fedora and Tumbleweed,
and Tumbleweed only lately upgraded systemd from 210 to 219, it looks like
systemd could be playing at least some part in this.
I first noticed
Hi,
I've just seen a bug happen similiar to [1] and [2]. My machine was
out of memory (and qemu launched via libvirt was killed by the OOM
killer), and since then I got Cannot use systemctl after heavy
swapping a lot in my journal.
strace'ing PID 1 showed this repeating pattern:
On Wed, 15.04.15 14:48, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek composed on 2015-04-15 18:11 (UTC):
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 13:31:38 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
This isn't the first time or the only system. This particular one is an old
Athlon booted to F22
On Wed, 15.04.15 22:45, Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org) wrote:
Hello,
I don't quite understand this:
$ systemctl --user status autocommit-org.service
● autocommit-org.service - Auto-commits changes to orgmode files.
Loaded: loaded
On Thu, 16.04.15 07:55, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
This isn't the first time or the only system. This particular one is an
old
Athlon booted to F22 just updated last night. In order to try some
follow-up
on a bug, I booted with drm.debug=14 log_buf_len=16M on
Hello all,
we get bug reports that the switch to systemd destroyed the underlying
partitions of encrypted swap partitions which were using offset=. As
this is silently ignored right now, the cryptsetup plain device always
starts at the beginning of the device, deleting everything which was
before
On Thu, 16.04.15 05:43, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
I asked the following on freedesktop list a month ago and got no response. As
there was quite some time between this showing up in Fedora and Tumbleweed,
and Tumbleweed only lately upgraded systemd from 210 to 219, it looks
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Yesterday, I discovered SD_BUS_VTABLE_CAPABILITY. Are there any
examples in which it does anything?
Please note that you need to be using kdbus to get any capabilities
transported, so in dbus1 this does
On Wed, 15.04.15 18:29, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
Felix Miata composed on 2015-04-15 14:48 (UTC-0400):
Zbigniew JÄdrzejewski-Szmek composed on 2015-04-15 18:11 (UTC):
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 13:31:38 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
This isn't the first time or the only
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 01:17:13PM -, systemd github import bot wrote:
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:20150416115501.GB3890%40piware.de
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
Are
Am 16.04.2015 um 16:28 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 01:17:13PM -, systemd github import bot wrote:
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:20150416115501.GB3890%40piware.de
--
Generated by
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1428923628-21315-1-git-send-email-alban%40endocode.com
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel mailing
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1428947219-26176-1-git-send-email-lkundrak%40v3.sk
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel mailing
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:20150416115501.GB3890%40piware.de
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel mailing list
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1429041708-32268-1-git-send-email-m.olbrich%40pengutronix.de
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Yesterday, I discovered SD_BUS_VTABLE_CAPABILITY. Are there any
examples in which it does anything?
Please note that you need to be using
Hello,
I wrote:
Sounds like you want to create intermediate.target, change
default.target to point at it, boot all the way up to
intermediate.target, and at that point isolate or start
multi-user.target.
I chose that solution, because from all possible solutions for the
desired boot
Hello Lennart,
I read the v218-283-gd7b8eec commit and found that you expected that
BTRFS_IOC_SUBVOL_CREATE returns ENOTTY if sub-volumes are not
supported. But in the compat-mode this ioctl returns EINVAL.
For example:
ext4_compat_ioctl returns ENOIOCTLCMD, then vfs_ioctl() convert it into
On Thu, 16.04.15 07:52, Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net) wrote:
I'm looking at sd_bus_query_sender_privilege, which does:
r = sd_bus_query_sender_creds(call,
SD_BUS_CREDS_UID|SD_BUS_CREDS_EUID|SD_BUS_CREDS_EFFECTIVE_CAPS,
creds);
That, in turn, does:
if (!c || !(c-mask
Hans Scholze wrote on 19/02/15 07:51:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Oliver Neukum oneu...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:52 -0800, Hans Scholze wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is considered a problem but I noticed some
spurious error messages during boot. The source appears
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 16.04.15 07:52, Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net) wrote:
I'm looking at sd_bus_query_sender_privilege, which does:
r = sd_bus_query_sender_creds(call,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Unshare your user namespace, set things up right, and systemd
or any other server will see you as having all capabilities. You've
fixed that in kdbus, but you haven't (and probably can't!) fix it in
the legacy code,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Unshare your user namespace, set things up right, and systemd
or any other server will see you as having all capabilities. You've
fixed that in kdbus,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
We have several uses of this, see my mail to Jiri regarding
CAP_SYS_BOOT for instance:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/16/219
I read that, but I
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 16.04.15 09:53, Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net) wrote:
It's a noop, unless people OR in SD_BUS_CREDS_AUGMENT into the flags
of creds they want. Doing this basically voids your warranty: it means
On Thu, 16.04.15 09:53, Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net) wrote:
It's a noop, unless people OR in SD_BUS_CREDS_AUGMENT into the flags
of creds they want. Doing this basically voids your warranty: it means
that the creds data shall be augmented with data from /proc, which are
good
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
We have several uses of this, see my mail to Jiri regarding
CAP_SYS_BOOT for instance:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/16/219
I read that, but I disagree with you.
CAP_SYS_BOOT is the privilege to directly
Hello again,
Martin Pitt [2015-04-16 6:55 -0500]:
This simple patch adds offset=. While I was at it I also added skip=.
I attached my script for testing this to the fd.o bug.
Zbigniew reviewed it on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87717 , thanks! This
updated patch makes
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
The ratio of complexity of capability code the kdbus folks have
already written (hundreds of lines across multiple files) to its
utility (very near
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 16.04.15 10:52, Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net) wrote:
It would be very helpful if you could go into details on why you think
more care is needed here than for other things. Is there anything
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015, at 02:23 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, to put together a more complex scenario for you: consider a small
web UI that can be used to set the system time. It should realy run at
minimal privileges, after all it has a surface to the web. Hence you
write it as daemon,
So recently I noticed that udev no longer deletes /dev symlinks for removed
devices, leaving quite a few dangling links over time (and greatly
confusing udisks as a side effect). This was broken by:
commit 3c0bab4aaf70b2383aa4cbabf6059c48744e8960
Author: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
Date: Fri Mar
On Apr 16 2015, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 15.04.15 22:45, Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org) wrote:
I don't quite understand this:
$ systemctl --user status autocommit-org.service
● autocommit-org.service - Auto-commits changes to orgmode files.
Loaded:
Excerpts from Lennart Poettering's message of 2015-04-08 23:55:31 +0200:
On Tue, 17.03.15 10:54, Peter Paule (systemd-de...@fedux.org) wrote:
Hi,
does it make sense to check if the system is started as a container in
systemd-remount-fs.service and only start the service if the system
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/
The last tag in the repo is v215. Can someone push the v216 through v219?
- Steven
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:56:39PM -0500, Martin Pitt wrote:
+} else if (startswith(option, offset=)) {
+
+if (safe_atou64(option+7, arg_offset) 0) {
+log_error(offset= parse failure, refusing.);
+return -EINVAL;
+
I have been running Arch package version 218-2 with the patches applied and
have not noticed any problems. Haven't tried applying them to anything
newer though.
Hans
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Colin Guthrie co...@mageia.org wrote:
Hans Scholze wrote on 19/02/15 07:51:
On Tue, Feb 17,
On Thu, 16.04.15 10:52, Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net) wrote:
It would be very helpful if you could go into details on why you think
more care is needed here than for other things. Is there anything
non-trivial going on here that I'm missing? The way capabilites are
exposed
39 matches
Mail list logo
