On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:17:07PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do point releases in systemd.
In systemd git we already
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1432331775-28932-2-git-send-email-charles%40dyfis.net
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel mailing
From: Charles Duffy chadu...@cisco.com
At present, systemd-cgtop converts quantities in bytes (memory and IO bandwidth
values) to human-readable form unconditionally.
Given as batch mode already exists as a supported option, there clearly is
intent for cgtop to be usable with data routed to
From: Charles Duffy chadu...@cisco.com
---
src/cgtop/cgtop.c | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c
index a390cf3..0dbac7f 100644
--- a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c
+++ b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
2015-05-27 2:51 GMT+02:00 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
The fact of the matter is, the last 2 releases of systemd have been
brown bag releases. Neither 219 nor 220 are useable as the tarballs are
provided. v220 doesn't even build in a large number of configurations.
v218 wasn't quite as
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1432619328-32030-1-git-send-email-m.olbrich%40pengutronix.de
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel
On 2015-05-26 00:05, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
I hit this issue after upgrading a system that used keyscript to
Jessie,
and it would no longer boot with systemd [1].
That led me to look into adding a password agent for my use case,
and/or
creating a generic one that would invoke keyscripts as
Hi,
I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked service?
Vendor default masked service has advantages like:
- systemctl start won't work
- dbus activation won't work
It is common that an embedded system doesn't use packages, rather it
ships everything in monolithic
On Sun, 24.05.15 22:41, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
It was a warning when we still supported kernel 3.4. current
minimum version is 3.7.
Hm, we don't actually fail out here, but we still try to
Hello.
I'm able to use:
dbus-send --system --print-reply --reply-timeout=2000 --type=method_call \
--dest=org.freedesktop.systemd1 \
/org/freedesktop/systemd1 org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager.ListUnits
to list system units.
But I can't seem to figure out how to do the same for user units.
26.05.2015 21:52, Martin Pitt wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 18:36 +0200]:
That said, I think even better would be to maybe make the support for
this generic in systemctl: instead of explicitly invoking chkconfig or
update-rcd, maybe we can just make systemctl invoke some fixed binary
Applied. Thanks!
Tom
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Torstein Husebø torst...@huseboe.net wrote:
---
NEWS| 4 ++--
man/journal-remote.conf.xml | 2 +-
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-control.c | 2 +-
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-creds.c | 6 +++---
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hello Tom, all,
with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
which used to be
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in
2015-05-26 17:57 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
There's a stable git tree maintained by Zbigniew, Lukas and friends,
that carries backports for the stable releases. Most vendors should
consider following that repo I figure.
I try to help the backporting business by tagging
On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same level
as the linux kernel
Thanks, finally got around to rebooting, and udev now starts properly.
However, when the cleanuphook calls udevadm control --exit, it takes
quite a while (though the system later boots normally). With --debug
enabled, I see:
udevd message (EXIT) received
[10-20 seconds pass]
timeout, giving up
Hi,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 8:41 PM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried ureadahead, but got following error:
write(2, ureadahead: Error while tracing:..., 59ureadahead: Error
while tracing: No such file or directory
Needs an out-of-tree kernel patch?
Yes, ureadahead needs an out-of-tree
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 18:22 +0200]:
Well, I certainly have enough things to do. We have trouble keeping up
with he amount of work that we already get, and I have no intention to
make things even more complex by maintaining multiple branches for
you, if the distros already do this
On Mon, 25.05.15 13:48, jsyna...@redhat.com (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
-static off_t arg_process_size_max = PROCESS_SIZE_MAX;
-static off_t arg_external_size_max = EXTERNAL_SIZE_MAX;
-static size_t arg_journal_size_max = JOURNAL_SIZE_MAX;
-static off_t arg_keep_free = (off_t) -1;
-static
Hey Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 17:31 +0200]:
But note that upstream is supposed to be non-redhat centric, and is
supposed to support non-merged /usr. If it's really about that, I#d be
inetersted to know what these patches are about, and maybe we can move
some upstream.
There's a
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com on Tue, 2015/05/26 17:11:
Hello Tom, all,
with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
which
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com on Tue, 2015/05/26 17:11:
Hello Tom, all,
with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
which
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
with systemd v220 I see inotify errors from udevd. I get this once:
systemd-udevd: inotify_add_watch(9, /dev/sr0, 10) failed: Bad file descriptor
And a lot of these:
systemd-udevd: inotify_add_watch(9,
On Fri, 22.05.15 11:27, Marc-Antoine Perennou (marc-anto...@perennou.com) wrote:
Hi,
On 22 May 2015 at 11:16, baldu...@units.it wrote:
hello,
while building 220 I get:
In file included from src/journal/audit-type.c:32:0:
src/journal/audit_type-to-name.h: In function
On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked
service?
Well, so far our thinking was that if the vendor wants to make a unit
completely unavailable he should simply not ship it in the first
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
But I can't seem to figure out how to do the same for user units.
There doesn't seem to be an org.freedesktop.systemd1 interface on my
current user's session bus and I wasn't able to spot anything in the
interfaces on the
This is stty -a from outside the container:
speed 38400 baud; rows 46; columns 114; line = 0;
intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = M-^?;
eol2 = M-^?; swtch = undef; start = ^Q;
stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; rprnt = ^R; werase = ^W; lnext = ^V; flush = ^O;
min = 1; time = 0;
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
But I can't seem to figure out how to do the same for user units.
There doesn't seem to be an org.freedesktop.systemd1 interface on my
current
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com on Tue, 2015/05/26 17:11:
Hello Tom, all,
with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
which used to be
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 703ms
Hi there,
I'm wondering what the functional difference is between doing:
ExecStartPre=/bin/foo
ExecStart=/bin/bar
and
ExecStart=/bin/foo
ExecStart=/bin/bar
From my read of the systemd.service man page, they appear to have the
same behavior in the common use case.
The only difference I can
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com
On 05/26/2015 11:12 PM, Steven Noonan wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering what the functional difference is between doing:
ExecStartPre=/bin/foo
ExecStart=/bin/bar
and
ExecStart=/bin/foo
ExecStart=/bin/bar
From my read of the systemd.service man page, they appear to have the
same
On Mon, 25.05.15 16:26, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net schrieb:
On Fri, 08.05.15 20:53, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
# systemd-nspawn -b --link-journal=try-guest --network-macvlan=enp4s0
# --
bind=/usr/portage
On Sun, 24.05.15 15:01, Anthony Alba (ascanio.al...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
On Fedora 22, systemd 219, NFS mounts no longer acquire a default label nfs_t.
mount 192.168.1.6:/var/exports/1 1 -orootcontext=system_u:object_r:nfs_t
mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
[
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do point releases in systemd.
In systemd git we already have now the change that makes sd-bus and
sd-event public APIs, hence v221 is
Hello all,
Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-05-26 15:12 +0100]:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Can we perhaps flip that around? I did a make dist/port our
patches/build packackages/run our tests round on May 11, but that was
before most of the recent hiccups landed in
On Sat, 23.05.15 11:03, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is there a simple way to make a service require that a specific network
interface/IP address be active?
I have a manually set up bridge and dnsmasq configuration for my VM
traffic, but dnsmasq is getting started before
On Fri, 22.05.15 17:28, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello,
while packaging 220, I got the audit related build failure that was
already reported [1], but also another one:
I think this has been fixed now with Tom's commit
ee3c31bf69746c5afc764c3d0337feec1bf25f0e contributed
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 16:06 +0200]:
I think this has been fixed now with Tom's commit
ee3c31bf69746c5afc764c3d0337feec1bf25f0e contributed my Marc-Antoine.
Confirmed this morning. Sorry, I should have followed up to the ML
immediately. Thanks Tom!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:26, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello all,
Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-05-26 15:12 +0100]:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Can we perhaps flip that around? I did a make dist/port our
patches/build packackages/run our
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 16:43 +0200]:
Well, I had been trying to stabilize things since 3 weeks before the
release
Ah, that's roughly when I did my last build packages from upstream
trunk test, and indeed it looked fairly well back then.
I didn't announce this on the ML though, but I
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do
On 26 May 2015 at 15:10, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 16:06 +0200]:
I think this has been fixed now with Tom's commit
ee3c31bf69746c5afc764c3d0337feec1bf25f0e contributed my Marc-Antoine.
Confirmed this morning. Sorry, I should have followed up to
Am 26.05.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do point releases in systemd.
and why?
just because don't do is not enough
26.05.2015 19:03, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 23.05.15 11:03, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is there a simple way to make a service require that a specific network
interface/IP address be active?
I have a manually set up bridge and dnsmasq configuration for my VM
traffic,
Hello Tom, all,
with 220 I get a severe boot time regression:
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 30.751s (kernel) + 11.706s (userspace) = 42.458s
which used to be
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 703ms (kernel) + 890ms (userspace) = 1.593s
(this is a VM)
It seems udevd
On Mon, 25.05.15 21:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello all,
in 220, path_is_mount_point() now always fails with -20 ENOTDIR when
calling it on files. This is problematic as it's perfectly valid to
have bind-mounted files; in fact, systemd's machine_id_setup() itself
On Sat, 23.05.15 00:09, Tobias Hunger (tobias.hun...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
I am having a problem with one of my containers set up with
systemd-nspawn. For some reason the return key will not work most of
the time (19 out of 20 attemps) after doing machinectl login into that
machine.
On Tue, 26.05.15 09:49, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 8:41 PM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried ureadahead, but got following error:
write(2, ureadahead: Error while tracing:..., 59ureadahead: Error
while tracing: No such file or
Hi Tom,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
So, udev v220 crashes in my initramfs with the following message:
starting version v220
Assertion 'manager-pid == getpid()' failed at
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 18:36 +0200]:
/etc/locale.conf is not a fedoraism. It has not existed on Fedora
before we introduced it. It's a systemd'ism if you so will: we looked
at where the distros configured these things and came to the
conclusion that all them were weird and nothing we
On Tue, 26.05.15 18:52, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
I really don't see how the xorg.conf.d drop-in should be
fedora-specific. That's an upstream X11 thing, and we just picked a
name for the file and that's it.
Are you saying Debian patched out supported for
On Tue, 26.05.15 19:13, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald
BOn Tue, 26.05.15 16:58, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
50 non-backport patches? That sounds like a lot...
It's not that bad, most of them are trivial, like tweaking tmpfiles.d
or some extra historic udev rules. We have quite a bunch of patches to
get rid of Fedora/RedHat-isms
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same level
as the linux kernel *just needs* point releases, there is a reason that the
kernel has
Am 26.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
which shows that a important project like systemd
---
NEWS| 4 ++--
man/journal-remote.conf.xml | 2 +-
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-control.c | 2 +-
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-creds.c | 6 +++---
src/shared/architecture.c | 2 +-
src/shared/architecture.h | 2 +-
src/shared/capability.h
2015-05-26 19:08 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Tue, 26.05.15 18:52, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/tree/debian/patches/Fix-paths-in-man-pages.patch?h=experimental-220
Not enthusiastic about the
58 matches
Mail list logo
