David Sommerseth wrote on 17/07/15 14:28:
On 17/07/15 13:31, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:13 PM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
mailto:dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking through some journals now, and even though I've seen it a
few times I
On 07/19/2015 11:01 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim namhy...@gmail.com
Looks good, thanks! However, it does not apply against current master.
Care to rebase? Also, we generally prefer GitHub pull requests these
days. And you can leave off the Signed-off-by line, we don't use
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:26:23PM +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
My system has two network planes - control plane (several 10.0.0.0/8
networks) and data plane (non-RFC1918 network, visible to end-users).
These two networks separated by two different bridges and some
iptables
On 07/17/2015 02:12 PM, Vivenzio Pagliari wrote:
---
man/systemd.preset.xml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Now merged through
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/626
Thanks!
Daniel
diff --git a/man/systemd.preset.xml b/man/systemd.preset.xml
index
Ahmed S. Darwish wrote on 18/07/15 01:44:
Hi Mantas,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:17:51AM +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish darwish...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently transforming a network daemon to become a native
There are a few examples similar to these in the source tree:
[Unit]
Description=Legacy D-Bus Protocol Compatibility Daemon
[Service]
ExecStart=@rootlibexecdir@/systemd-bus-proxyd
--address=kernel:path=/sys/fs/kdbus/0-system/bus
NotifyAccess=main
CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_IPC_OWNER CAP_SETUID
Hi
I need to use functions to call method, get property value etc from dbus.
also few utility functions like unit_name_from_dbus_path() from systemd.
Can i use systemd as lib ? If yes how , where can I see examples?
is there any lib for that in c /c++?
Thanks
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote:
On 07/19/2015 11:01 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim namhy...@gmail.com
Looks good, thanks! However, it does not apply against current master.
Care to rebase? Also, we generally prefer GitHub pull
On 07/20/2015 01:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.07.2015 um 13:24 schrieb Florian Weimer:
CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_IPC_OWNER CAP_SETUID CAP_SETGID CAP_SETPCAP
m4_ifdef(`HAVE_SMACK', CAP_MAC_ADMIN )
…
What's the intent of these settings? Is it a form of hardening? If
yes, it is
- Original Message -
From: Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie
To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Confusing journal information - journal size
David Sommerseth wrote on 17/07/15 14:28:
On 17/07/15 13:31,
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 06:14:22AM -0400, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 07/19/2015 11:01 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim namhy...@gmail.com
Looks good, thanks! However, it does not apply against current master.
Care to rebase? Also, we generally prefer GitHub pull requests
On 07/20/2015 02:06 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org
mailto:dan...@zonque.org wrote:
On 07/19/2015 11:01 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim namhy...@gmail.com
mailto:namhy...@gmail.com
Looks good,
There is a bug in GCC LTO such that it ignores assembler directives.
This patch makes LTO enabled by default but also allows it to be disabled
if required.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
Ray Kinsella
---
configure.ac | 17 -
1 file changed, 12
Patchset imported to github.
To create a pull request, one of the main developers has to initiate one via:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1437404176.3279.2.camel%40intel.com
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
David Sommerseth wrote on 20/07/15 16:29:
On 20/07/15 15:31, Anne Mulhern wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie
To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Confusing journal information -
On 20/07/15 15:31, Anne Mulhern wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie
To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Confusing journal information - journal size
David Sommerseth wrote on
- Original Message -
From: David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
To: Anne Mulhern amulh...@redhat.com
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:29:22 AM
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Confusing journal information - journal size
On 20/07/15 15:31, Anne
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 09:22:45AM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:25:29PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:41 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
...
Now, a question...how is an object manager supposed to be implemented in
sd-bus?
I've
On 20/07/15 17:49, Colin Guthrie wrote:
David Sommerseth wrote on 20/07/15 16:29:
On 20/07/15 15:31, Anne Mulhern wrote:
[...snip...]
After seeing the explanation, the best complete and correct (AFAICT)
formulation I could come up with was,
Runtime journal is using 8.0M (max allowed =
[resending with the right systemd-devel address, sorry for that]
Here are some thoughts on offline updates resulting from testing
the new dnf fedup plugin developed by Will Woods
[https://github.com/wgwoods/dnf-plugin-fedup].
I ran an update using dnf fedup and it works (or would have worked, if
20 matches
Mail list logo
