On Sun, 23.08.15 21:58, Kai Hendry (hen...@webconverger.com) wrote:
Hi there,
I've managed to get Firefox running like so:
sudo systemd-nspawn --setenv=DISPLAY=:0 \
--setenv=XAUTHORITY=~/.Xauthority \
--bind-ro=$HOME/.Xauthority:/root/.Xauthority \
On Fri, 21.08.15 12:22, Some Body (somebody.mo...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi, I'm not experienced at all with systemd, and not much more in system
administration, and I don't know if I should post this here, but it is the
only list I found that seems to provide general support for systemd.
I want
On Fri, 21.08.15 07:24, john maverick (johnmaveric...@inbox.com) wrote:
Hello.
I just re-read Lennart's posts (which i loved):
- Factory Reset, Stateless Systems, Reproducible Systems Verifiable Systems
and
- Revisiting How We Put Together Linux Systems
And i would like to know
Hi John,
I do run a couple of (mostly -- I do keep /var) stateless systems and
have few problems with those ever since systemd 222.
Best Regards,
Tobias
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 21.08.15 07:24, john maverick
On 21 August 2015 at 11:56, João Paulo Rechi Vita jprv...@gmail.com wrote:
PS: Please let me know if this is not the preffered way of sending patches
to systemd, as I've seen some activity on github. I can prepare a PR if
needed.
I've created a pull request, since looking at older messages
Hi
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:07 PM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-08-07 17:18 GMT+08:00 eshark eshar...@163.com:
Hi, all
If some message went into bus-wqueue, and failed to run
ioctl(KDBUS_CMD_SEND) and returned r 0,
I found that this message will remain in the bus-wqueue.
On 21/08/15 17:04, Jayson Willson wrote:
However, on my system, without any special
polkit configuration standard user (which is in the groups mentioned
above) can ignore inhibitors by running systemctl poweroff -i without
being asked for authentication.
For the benefit of the list, it
Hi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Seems like this does not apply. I said that terminals do not start, and this
is random, sometimes they do. n_auto_vts = 6.
Can you provide more details about this? How do you reproduce it? What
are you running
I have actually reported this as an issue on github.
From the later conversation via issue comments with Lennard I have
discovered that brltty is holding the /dev/vcsa open, interfering with
tty autoactivation logic.
W dniu 24.08.2015 o 12:08, David Herrmann pisze:
Hi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015
On 08/23/2015 08:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
Here is my setup:
Host: Archlinux systemd 224-1
Container: Fedora 22 systemd 219
The container is a server and has vocation to be one day deployed on a
dediacted server for production. In this way, I would like to set
SElinux (default in
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/23/2015 08:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
Here is my setup:
Host: Archlinux systemd 224-1
Container: Fedora 22 systemd 219
The container is a server and has vocation to be one day deployed on a
dediacted server
On Mon, 24.08.15 21:50, Liam Girdwood (liam.r.girdw...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
Currently firmware loading with built-in drivers is failing on systems
that mount an initramfs before the root FS is mounted (that contains the
firmware file). Modular drivers work fine.
Keyon (Jie, Yang) has
Currently firmware loading with built-in drivers is failing on systems
that mount an initramfs before the root FS is mounted (that contains the
firmware file). Modular drivers work fine.
Keyon (Jie, Yang) has done some testing with the Intel audio DSP driver
and found that the built-in firmware
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, at 08:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I'd be careful with things like this... You invoke firefox as PID 1
then. On UNIX PID 1 is special, it needs to reap foreign children and
needs to handle signals differently, thus taking arbitrary processes
and running them like this
14 matches
Mail list logo
