On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:37:46PM -0500, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Greg KH"
> > To: "Anne Mulhern"
> > Cc: "David Herrmann" , "systemd"
> >
> >
> Typically this is because they are only useful for whole system containers,
> rather than service or application containment.
>
> What services are you running that you want to be able to isolate this with?
I want a sandbox, which doen't allow to communicate between inside and outside.
At
> systemd servies ar enot supposed to be a container environment. Hence
> they only expose namespacing options that slightly rearrange things,
> take rights way and suchlike but do not make structural changes to the
> whole system, they don't create a completely new virtualized machine
> for the
- Original Message -
> From: "Greg KH"
> To: "Anne Mulhern"
> Cc: "David Herrmann" , "systemd"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:42:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel]
On 11/23/2015 10:10 AM, Steven Abner wrote:
systemd-networkd[260]: wlan0 : found matching network
'/etc/systemd/network/11-dhcp-wlan0.network', based on potentially
unpredictable ifname
I assume its harmless message, but someone went to trouble of issuing
warning in
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:37:08AM -0500, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Herrmann"
> > To: "Anne Mulhern"
> > Cc: "systemd"
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015
> Sure; just look as "man systemd" how to enable debug output.
How embarrassing for me ;)
Thank you, exactly what I needed to continue.
I narrowed it down to a service, of which I do not need. Problem solved.
Thanks again and apologies for not just checking the man page!
On Mon, Nov 23,
Hi,
I want to use namespaces in systemd services,
so I'm trying to use Private* (such as PrivateNetwork, PrivateTmp) options.
But, I wonder that there are no PrivateIPC, PrivateUTS, and PrivateUser.
How can the service has its own private ipc/uts/user namespace by just using
systemd.exec
Hi
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>> From: "David Herrmann"
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>> > libudev has some cooperating procedures that return the keys for a bunch of
>> >
Hi
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:02 PM, SGT. Garcia wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> in kmscon cdev-session was removed before dvdherm stopped working on it in
> favour of libuvt and systemd-logind; so reads the commit logs.
>
> i wonder if anyone here has managed to run X (or any
- Original Message -
> From: "David Herrmann"
> To: "Anne Mulhern"
> Cc: "systemd"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:43:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] libudev: subdirectories in sysfs (what
Hi
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>> From: "David Herrmann"
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>> >> From: "David Herrmann"
>> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:35
On Tue, 24.11.15 09:13, Sungbae Yoo (sungbae@samsung.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use namespaces in systemd services,
> so I'm trying to use Private* (such as PrivateNetwork, PrivateTmp) options.
>
> But, I wonder that there are no PrivateIPC, PrivateUTS, and PrivateUser.
> How can the
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:13:47AM +, Sungbae Yoo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use namespaces in systemd services,
> so I'm trying to use Private* (such as PrivateNetwork, PrivateTmp) options.
>
> But, I wonder that there are no PrivateIPC, PrivateUTS, and PrivateUser.
Typically this is
- Original Message -
> From: "David Herrmann"
> To: "Anne Mulhern"
> Cc: "systemd"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:15:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] libudev: subdirectories in sysfs (what
Hi
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>> From: "David Herrmann"
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Anne Mulhern wrote:
>> >> From: "David Herrmann"
>> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:57
On 11/23/2015 11:25 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
systemd-networkd is socket activated on RTNETLINK messages; apparently
after networkd is shut down more events come (I suppose wpa_supplicant
shutdown may well trigger LINK event).
To this extent this is probably cosmetic, although annoying.
17 matches
Mail list logo