Hi!
Thank you very much!
It just shows that I was never patient enough to actually test it long
enough to hit 30min timeout (after about 15 min I generally would reset the
system).
The JobTimeoutSec is a good candidate to be reduced to something like 5 min
for our use case.
Best regards.
sorry guys to bother you, but
I'll see myself going slowly mad next week, for I've been
reading and tryingand trying..
and I fail to tell udev to ignore a device and not to create
symlinks.
I need someone to 100% confirm this should work in v.219.
The way Ithink(or hope) it should work
Am Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:13:25 +0200
schrieb Lennart Poettering :
> On Tue, 21.03.17 07:47, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > I have a oneshot service (run from a timer) that updates the TLS
> > certificates in my mod_nss database. Because NSS doesn't support
On Sun, 05.03.17 15:59, Pascal Kolijn (p.kol...@vu.nl) wrote:
> Peace,
>
> On 28/02/2017 16:00, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 28.02.17 13:26, Pascal kolijn (p.kol...@vu.nl) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi List,
> >>
> >> I've subscribed to this list to ask for help in debugging a problem we
> >>
Will do sir
apologies was looking if people had experienced anything like this with
systemd and/or proper places to insert a pause/slow down in a unit file to
let devices get populated. These volumes mounted reliable under sysint and
centos 6u5.
Basically was looking to see if I have to update my
On Thu, 09.03.17 13:00, Sergei Franco (sergei.fra...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Thank you very much for pointing out the "After" vs "Before", as in for
> ExecStop to run Before filesytem is unmounted it must be configured as
> After :).
> This fixes the Ubuntu unattended upgrades unit that
On Sat, 11.03.17 08:41, William Tu (u9012...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm not sure if this is caused by systemd-udev, apology if it's not
> the right place. When doing
> # brctl addbr default
> add bridge failed: Invalid argument
If brctl fails with EINVAL, then this suggests that the kernel
On Thu, 16.03.17 00:27, Bhasker C V (bhas...@unixindia.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using --network-bridge option to setup my container systemd-nspawn.
> I however dont see any option in man systemd-nspawn to specify a MAC
> Address for the host0 interface. Is there a way to do this ?
> I
On Tue, 14.03.17 19:18, Chris Trobridge (christrobri...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Fedora 25 I can rename a tap interface with a .link file in
> /etc/systemd/network but I cannot rename any Ethernet interfaces.
It should work for all interfaces.
My educated guess is that your .link file was
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 16:04 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 30.03.17 09:53, John Florian (j...@doubledog.org) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 15:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22.03.17 16:47, John Florian (j...@doubledog.org) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mar 22 16:11:42
On Mon, 20.03.17 12:38, Ken Bass (kb...@kenbass.com) wrote:
> I thought I followed the instructions (using Centos 7 - I believe
> systemd219) ... I am running a local news server (innd.service).
>
> I needed to add an additional inetd style daemon for nnrpd to support SSL.
> See files below.
On Tue, 21.03.17 07:47, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have a oneshot service (run from a timer) that updates the TLS
> certificates in my mod_nss database. Because NSS doesn't support
> concurrent access to the database, I need to temporarily shut down
> Apache while the
On Tue, 21.03.17 20:31, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:47:59 -0500
> schrieb Ian Pilcher :
>
> > I have a oneshot service (run from a timer) that updates the TLS
> > certificates in my mod_nss database. Because NSS doesn't support
> >
On Mon, 20.03.17 16:37, Stanislav Angelovič (angelovi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use sd-bus for DBus IPC in our own applications. Some applications of
> ours cause the dbus daemon to issue "Connection has not authenticated soon
> enough, closing it" message, leading to the
>
On Mon, 20.03.17 19:40, Stanislav Angelovič (angelovi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> thanks for quick response. Instead of sd_bus_process(), we could perhaps
> use sd_bus_flush() after creating the connection, as that one actually
> processes the requests until the connection changes state
On Thu, 30.03.17 09:53, John Florian (j...@doubledog.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 15:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 22.03.17 16:47, John Florian (j...@doubledog.org) wrote:
> >
> > > Mar 22 16:11:42 localhost systemd[1]: sshd.service: Looking at job
> > >
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 15:32 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 22.03.17 16:47, John Florian (j...@doubledog.org) wrote:
>
> > Mar 22 16:11:42 localhost systemd[1]: sshd.service: Looking at job
> > sshd.service/start conflicted_by=no
> > Mar 22 16:11:42 localhost systemd[1]: sshd.service:
On Wed, 22.03.17 16:47, John Florian (j...@doubledog.org) wrote:
> Mar 22 16:11:42 localhost systemd[1]: sshd.service: Looking at job
> sshd.service/start conflicted_by=no
> Mar 22 16:11:42 localhost systemd[1]: sshd.service: Looking at job
> sshd.service/stop conflicted_by=yes
> Mar 22 16:11:42
On Thu, 23.03.17 19:13, Yunchih Chen (yunc...@csie.ntu.edu.tw) wrote:
>
>
> On 03/23/2017 06:29 PM, Michael Chapman wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, Yunchih Chen wrote:
> > > Hello:
> > >
> > >At my organization, there can be hundreds of user logins in a
> > > public workstation each day,
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote:
[...]
I am sorry, but XFS is really broken here. All init systems since time
began kinda did the same thing when shutting down:
a) try to unmount all fs that can be unmounted
b) for the remaining ones, try to remount ro (the root fs usually
On Mon, 13.03.17 16:25, jsl6uy js16uy (js1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello all, hope all is well
> Is there a dependency or delay that needs to be added to have volumes
> attached via HBA and managed by multipathd/devmapper and lvm reliably mount
> on boot?
Please contact the multipath/DM folks
On Wed, 22.03.17 11:05, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > Result code of "remount ro" is not evaluated or logged. systemd does
> >
> > (void) mount(NULL, m->path, NULL, MS_REMOUNT|MS_RDONLY, options);
> >
> > where "options" are those from /proc/self/mountinfo sans ro|rw.
> >
> >
On Mon, 27.03.17 22:27, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>
> > Ok so the dirty file system problem always happens with all pk offline
> > updates on Fedora using either ext4 or XFS with any layout; and
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Or to say this differently: if they expect us to invoke some magic
> per-filesystem ioctl() before reboot(), then that's nonsense. No init
> system calls that, and I am strongly against such hacks. They should
>
On Tue, 28.03.17 11:31, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> OK but it's obviously possible for a developer to run a process from
> root fs, and mark it kill exempt. That's the problem under discussion,
> the developer is doing the wrong thing, and it's allowed. And it's
> been going
On Tue, 07.03.17 03:15, lin webber (webber...@outlook.com) wrote:
> I use “system("reboot")” in my C program and system does not shutdown.I think
> that systemd is waiting for some services to shutdown which can't shutdown
> immediately.
> But I don't want to wait for those services to
26 matches
Mail list logo