coredumpctl debug dbus-daemon
assuming it already crashed. M
-- Ryan
https://refi64.com/
On May 23, 2019, 12:16 PM -0500, Dorian ROSSE , wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> I went to follow this link : https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Core_dump
>
> I readen also coredump is missing for systemd,
On Do, 23.05.19 10:29, Roger Pack (rogerdpa...@gmail.com) wrote:
> As a note, if I have a sysV /etc/init.d/name service that is "turned
> on" by "chkconfig --add name" it seems that it adds it to *different
> targets* than what "systemctl enable name" does (which appears to run
> "chkconfig name
Am 23.05.19 um 18:29 schrieb Roger Pack:
> As a note, if I have a sysV /etc/init.d/name service that is "turned
> on" by "chkconfig --add name" it seems that it adds it to *different
> targets* than what "systemctl enable name" does (which appears to run
> "chkconfig name on" enabling it for
Hello everybody,
I went to follow this link : https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Core_dump
I readen also coredump is missing for systemd,
How to install core dump ?
Because I can’t use gdb for dbus-daemon as Following :
(gdb) generate-core-file
You can't do that without a process to debug.
As a note, if I have a sysV /etc/init.d/name service that is "turned
on" by "chkconfig --add name" it seems that it adds it to *different
targets* than what "systemctl enable name" does (which appears to run
"chkconfig name on" enabling it for all runlevels). This seems a bit
confusing? is it
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:43:27PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
> Yup, go for it.
Done.
Zbyszek
> On 23/05/2019 12:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:27:56PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
> >> Yeah of course, didn't even think. I'm happy with that but I've lost
Yup, go for it.
On 23/05/2019 12:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:27:56PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
>> Yeah of course, didn't even think. I'm happy with that but I've lost the
>> rights to change this.
> Is "node-sd-notify" ok?
>
> Zbyszek
>
>> On 23/05/2019
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:27:56PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
> Yeah of course, didn't even think. I'm happy with that but I've lost the
> rights to change this.
Is "node-sd-notify" ok?
Zbyszek
>
> On 23/05/2019 12:25, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew
Yeah of course, didn't even think. I'm happy with that but I've lost the
rights to change this.
On 23/05/2019 12:25, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub
> > (https://github.com/roryrjb/sd-notify) and npm
> >
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 23.05.2019 um 12:41 in
Nachricht
:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:56 AM Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> After seeing that systemd generators are run as the very first step in
>> systemd's life (deduced from the timestamps), I quit the idea of using
them,
>>
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> >>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 20.05.2019 um 19:07 in
> Nachricht <4d103eef-d000-c9b2-9f7a-e0cda8ed6...@gmail.com>:
> > 20.05.2019 16:36, Ulrich Windl пишет:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I have had the effect that a "systectl status" before and
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:56 AM Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> After seeing that systemd generators are run as the very first step in
> systemd's life (deduced from the timestamps), I quit the idea of using them,
> and started to use another sort of generator:
>
> I have a generator target,
Hi Lennart,
Sorry for a bit late reply, I've been quite busy recently.
> So we could readd the ability to create a bus message with a NULL bus,
> but I am a bit concerned that people then always pass NULL which might
> ultimately result in constant remarshalling if the message is
> eventually
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:11:32AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
> Many thanks!
>
> The repo has been moved.
Cool, welcome ;)
I updated https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ to match.
Let us know if you want to add more maintainers to the nodejs group.
Zbyszek
>
> On 23/05/2019
Many thanks!
The repo has been moved.
On 23/05/2019 10:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub
>> (https://github.com/roryrjb/sd-notify) and npm
>>
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub
> (https://github.com/roryrjb/sd-notify) and npm
> (https://www.npmjs.com/package/sd-notify) that has been contributed to
> and is being used by others. As
Hi!
After seeing that systemd generators are run as the very first step in
systemd's life (deduced from the timestamps), I quit the idea of using them,
and started to use another sort of generator:
I have a generator target, that creates another target and a few service
targets.
The interesting
Hi,
I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub
(https://github.com/roryrjb/sd-notify) and npm
(https://www.npmjs.com/package/sd-notify) that has been contributed to
and is being used by others. As the name suggests it binds to
sd_notify_* functions.
It would be nice to
I have sent the following message to various desktop environment mailing lists
SUBJECT: Proposal: passing user idle time to systemd-logind
KDE Plasma: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/2019-May/098194.html
GNOME: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/msg00088.html
On Do, 23.05.19 07:32, Kees Bos (cornelis@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I couldn't find it with google, and before digging in the code just a
> quick question. Probably someone knows it in the top of h(is|er)
> head...
>
> It seems that systemd drops rlimit_memlock on startup. Correct? And
21 matches
Mail list logo
