[systemd-devel] Reduce loading time (size) of init program (systemd)

2019-09-16 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear systemd folks, In his talk *Linux kernel fastboot on the way* at this years Linux Plumbers Conference [1][2], Feng Tang (CCed) has the notes below on the slide for userspace/systemd. > • Systemd is ~1.5MB - the loading time for emmc is 100ms> • Can we use a > small lightweight “init”

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Daniel Duong
> You should check to see if anything is actually still referencing these > units. Try `systemd-analyze dump` and see if any "ReferencedBy" entries > appear for these units. It seems that they are referencing each other: -> Unit belleshop@0.58.service: [...]

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Daniel Duong
> Normally units should be unloaded immediately if they are stopped > and didn't fail. What systemd version are you using? (One possibility > to consider is that the glob matches *files*, and you are simply loading > the units at the time the systemctl query is made. Use 'belleshop@*' > instead.)

[systemd-devel] networkd - how to (partially) manage OpenVPN interfaces?

2019-09-16 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, when I run an OpenVPN interface, OpenVPN manages the interface itself: It handles creation, destruction and assignment of the IP address. The IP address can be controlled by the remote site, so the OpenVPN daemon is kind of the only thing that can configured the Interface. I would, however,

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Michael Chapman
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Daniel Duong wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each > instance is a version of my web application. > > After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I > enable the new one: > systemctl start

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Michael Chapman
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 16.09.19 um 09:36 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > Normally units should be unloaded immediately if they are stopped > > and didn't fail. What systemd version are you using? > > the better question is which one are you using because this

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.09.19 um 09:36 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > Normally units should be unloaded immediately if they are stopped > and didn't fail. What systemd version are you using? the better question is which one are you using because this behavior below exists for many years and it's good

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 03:12:22AM +, Daniel Duong wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each > instance is a version of my web application. > > After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I > enable the new one: >