Re: [systemd-devel] Prefix delegation and IPv6 subnetting

2022-07-07 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 07.07.2022 18:25, Bent Bagger wrote: > > The prefix delegation problem starts with the interactions between net0 > and net2. Net0 is delegated a /56 prefix from the main router (which > runs radvd and dhcpd6, not networkd, for historical reasons). I want > net2 to delegate a /60 subnet to

Re: [systemd-devel] Prefix delegation and IPv6 subnetting

2022-07-07 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Thursday, July 07, 2022 6:25 PM +0200 Bent Bagger wrote: I have become fascinated by prefix delegation and ipv6 subnetting - to the extent that I have decided to learn more about it. I'm learning the same stuff. FWIW, I'm on a RHEL-based system with systemd+NetworkManager and am

Re: [systemd-devel] Dropping split-usr/unmerged-usr support

2022-07-07 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 9:41 AM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 00:48 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hi Wol, > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:02 AM Wol wrote: > > > > > > On 07/04/2022 17:47, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > > So, my guess would be that the people who dislike

Re: [systemd-devel] Dropping split-usr/unmerged-usr support

2022-07-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 00:48 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Wol, > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:02 AM Wol wrote: > > > > On 07/04/2022 17:47, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > So, my guess would be that the people who dislike merged-/usr are also > > > > the ones who dislike systemd, no? i.e. do

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Dropping split-usr/unmerged-usr support

2022-07-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 10:33 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 10:39 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 08:39 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:07 AM Luca Boccassi > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 06:51 -0400, Neal

[systemd-devel] What is purpose of new DNS proxy address?

2022-07-07 Thread Petr Menšík
Hi! I would like to know what is purpose of DNS proxy listener at 127.0.0.54 address. What were primary motivation for its creation? Would it be possible having just (cached) DNS protocol on default stub 127.0.0.53? LLMNR could be handled by nss-resolve plugin, which provides everything