On 3/24/23 15:52, Eric Blake wrote:
> [attempting to loop in systemd folks; this started in libnbd at
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2023-March/031178.html
> - although I may have to retry since I'm not a usual subscriber of
> systemd-devel]
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at
On 3/24/23 15:52, Eric Blake wrote:
> [attempting to loop in systemd folks; this started in libnbd at
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2023-March/031178.html
> - although I may have to retry since I'm not a usual subscriber of
> systemd-devel]
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at
On 2023-03-24 20:01, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 07:16:56PM +, Martin wrote:
>> Any idea, what I might missing?
>
> Permissions?
> (Incresing logging verbosity may give you some hints. [1][2])
Thank you very much!
I'm not sure, if I will debug that, because meanwhile I
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 09:43:37AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann
wrote:
> Any thoughts?
Luca's idea of temporary units may work for your runtime
differentiation.
Although, I was thinking of a another use of such a "tagging" mechanism
-- systemd-coredump could skip processing of certain coredumps to
Hello.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 07:16:56PM +, Martin wrote:
> Any idea, what I might missing?
Permissions?
(Incresing logging verbosity may give you some hints. [1][2])
> PS: My ultimate goal is to run bpftrace in the container. Seems to be
> slightly tricky.
I wouldn't call it a
[attempting to loop in systemd folks; this started in libnbd at
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2023-March/031178.html
- although I may have to retry since I'm not a usual subscriber of
systemd-devel]
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> @@ -245,6
I think it is fairly easy. If the /etc/resolv.conf changes not by a
change of systemd-resolved, it is very likely the address specified in
it does not point to resolved anymore. In that sense it does not matter
what systemd-resolved does with such information and how quickly.
Does it update
On Fr, 24.03.23 03:16, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Even if it could not use filesystem monitoring, I guess it could check those
> files only once per second or so. Should not depend on number of done
> queries.
It's not so easy. We generally want to give the guarantee that if
On Do, 23.03.23 16:59, Etienne Champetier (champetier.etie...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Le jeu. 23 mars 2023 à 16:37, Etienne Champetier
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm setting `CPUAffinity=0-1` in /etc/systemd/system.conf, this works great.
> > Now, I want one of my units to set CPUAffinity to
