Hey Lennart.
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 16:35 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> In almost all scenarios you want swap, regardless if little RAM or a
> lot. For specialist cases where you run everything from memory, and
> not even programs are backed by disk there might be exceptions.
Similar to the
Hi Torsten,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:58:05PM +0200, f...@igh.de wrote:
>
> Dear Systemd Folx,
>
>
>
> I have a laptop that I run at different locations with different
> networks. I want to have static(!) network setup (address, gateway, DNS,
> NTP) for my wired adapter on these networks. I
On Mi, 29.03.23 14:07, Christoph Anton Mitterer (cales...@scientia.org) wrote:
> When I use
>systemd.log_level=debug systemd.log_target=console
> in the kernel parameters, and then do systemctl hibernate during the
> system I get:
> Mar 29 12:04:48 hbt systemd-logind[780]: Got message
On Mi, 29.03.23 13:53, Christoph Anton Mitterer (cales...@scientia.org) wrote:
> > > That's a bad idea btw. I'd advise you not to do that: on modern
> > > systems you want swap, since it makes anonymous memory reclaimable.
> > > I
> > > am not sure where you are getting this idea from that swap
Dear Systemd Folx,
I have a laptop that I run at different locations with different
networks. I want to have static(!) network setup (address, gateway, DNS,
NTP) for my wired adapter on these networks. I can define setup for
each of them in a .network file matching my interface (eth0), but only
This report led me to few checks and indeed. What systemd-resolved is
doing with NXDOMAIN responses from clearly proper servers is plain
terrible. It should stop doing it the current way ASAP. Instead of
caching negative response it doubles each query resulting in NXDOMAIN
response. Not once
When I use
systemd.log_level=debug systemd.log_target=console
in the kernel parameters, and then do systemctl hibernate during the
system I get:
Mar 29 12:04:48 hbt systemd-logind[780]: Got message type=method_call
sender=:1.9 destination=org.freedesktop.login1 path=/org/freedesktop/login1
Hey.
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 10:20 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > That's a bad idea btw. I'd advise you not to do that: on modern
> > systems you want swap, since it makes anonymous memory reclaimable.
> > I
> > am not sure where you are getting this idea from that swap was
> > bad.
Well I
On Mi, 29.03.23 04:43, Christoph Anton Mitterer (cales...@scientia.org) wrote:
Hi!
> I guess many people nowadays will run without any swap for the normal
> paging use, but only have it for hibernation (at least on laptops).
That's a bad idea btw. I'd advise you not to do that: on modern
On Mi, 29.03.23 09:19, Stephan Bergmann (sberg...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 28/03/2023 22:58, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Di, 28.03.23 08:13, Stephan Bergmann (sberg...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > * Is it guaranteed for system-run --scope that the wrapped command will
> > > run
> > > in the
On 28/03/2023 22:58, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Di, 28.03.23 08:13, Stephan Bergmann (sberg...@redhat.com) wrote:
* Is it guaranteed for system-run --scope that the wrapped command will run
in the surrounding process group? (Because LibreOffice' Jenkins relies on a
single process group for a
11 matches
Mail list logo
