On 27.01.2024 00:40, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 1/26/24 01:21, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 25.01.24 16:28, Orion Poplawski (or...@nwra.com) wrote:
We have various VMs that are back by luks encrypted LVs. At boot the volumes
are decrypted by clevis. The problem we are seeing at the
> > Interepreting arbitrary regexes configured by unpriv code in priv code
> > comes at some risk,. becose afair constructing them can come at O(2^n)
> > time, i.e. a rogue regex could make use consume unbounded time on
> > processing journal messages.
>
> Which regex engine is used? glibc’s
On 1/26/24 01:21, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 25.01.24 16:28, Orion Poplawski (or...@nwra.com) wrote:
>
>> We have various VMs that are back by luks encrypted LVs. At boot the volumes
>> are decrypted by clevis. The problem we are seeing at the moment is that the
>> VMs are started
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:11:24AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 25.01.24 22:29, Farblos (akfkqu.9df...@vodafonemail.de) wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I sent below mail some week ago, Barry's reply left me unsure as to
> > whether this would be a bug or not. I still tend do assume that
Hello,
with huge memory buff/cache a umount can take very long:
time umount /mnt/u2
real 10m43.026s
user 0m0.000s
sys 10m27.985s
which then causes a system not to umount the device properly when
rebooting, watching serial console:
[ OK ] Deactivated swap /dev/sda4.
[ OK
> Interepreting arbitrary regexes configured by unpriv code in priv code
> comes at some risk,. becose afair constructing them can come at O(2^n)
> time, i.e. a rogue regex could make use consume unbounded time on
> processing journal messages.
>
> Hence, I wouldn't hold your breath. Unless
On Do, 25.01.24 16:28, Orion Poplawski (or...@nwra.com) wrote:
> We have various VMs that are back by luks encrypted LVs. At boot the volumes
> are decrypted by clevis. The problem we are seeing at the moment is that the
> VMs are started before the block devices are decrypted. Our current
>
On Do, 25.01.24 22:29, Farblos (akfkqu.9df...@vodafonemail.de) wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I sent below mail some week ago, Barry's reply left me unsure as to
> whether this would be a bug or not. I still tend do assume that I'm
> "doing something wrong".
This is currently not supported. The filters are
