Re: [systemd-devel] restart vs. stop/start

2016-05-23 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016, 11:43:13 CEST schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Sun, 22.05.16 16:18, Christian Boltz wrote: > > I can add my usecase as another reason ;-) > > > > I'm talking about AppArmor, where "stop" means unloading the > > profiles > &

Re: [systemd-devel] restart vs. stop/start

2016-05-23 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016, 11:24:06 CEST schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Fri, 20.05.16 21:50, Christian Boltz wrote: > > it looks like > > > > systemctl restart foo > > > > is internally mapped to a sequence of > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] restart vs. stop/start

2016-05-22 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016, 21:48:02 CEST schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 22.05.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Christian Boltz: > > I'm already using ExecReload= to reload the profiles (works fine), > > and hope all users actually read the documentation and use reload > &g

Re: [systemd-devel] restart vs. stop/start

2016-05-22 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016, 20:24:53 CEST schrieb Martin Pitt: > Christian Boltz [2016-05-22 16:18 +0200]: > > "start" means loading the profiles and applying the confinement to > > _newly started_ profiles. > > > > This also means that _already running

Re: [systemd-devel] restart vs. stop/start

2016-05-22 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2016, 10:31:22 CEST schrieb Andrei Borzenkov: > 21.05.2016 05:59, Reindl Harald пишет: > > Am 20.05.2016 um 21:50 schrieb Christian Boltz: > >> systemctl restart foo > >> > >> is internally mapped to a sequence of > >>

Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl how to stop a service

2016-05-16 Thread Christian Boltz
e somewhat random/racy because the kill can happen at different states of the restart. Can you still reproduce the issue you described if you at least add a "sleep 5" before killing systemctl? Regards, Christian Boltz -- [Greylisting ist] das alte Hotline-Prinzip: Wenn der 4 Minuten lang in de