update TODO
What happened to this patch set? Are you going to send a new version?
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
then. Now
when I'm reviewing pullrequests I never trust to review them directly
in the browser but I rather pull all the pullrequests with a variant
of your git pullnotes:
alias.pullpr = fetch origin refs/pull/*:refs/pull/*
--
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:02 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Lucas De Marchi
lucas.de.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course this is a non-issue for several projects in github which
don't have proper commit
review. It's not the case of systemd
--
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
From: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demar...@intel.com
If we don't check the error of the child process, systemd-vconsole-setup
would exit with 0 even if it could not really setup the console.
For a simple test, move loadkeys elsewhere and execute
systemd-vconsole-setup:
[root@localhost
From: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demar...@intel.com
If we don't check the error of the child process, systemd-vconsole-setup
would exit with 0 even if it could not really setup the console.
For a simple test, move loadkeys elsewhere and execute
systemd-vconsole-setup:
[root@localhost
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:00:55AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Lucas De Marchi
lucas.de.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:56 PM, lucas.de.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demar...@intel.com
If we don't check the error of the child process, systemd-vconsole-setup
would exit with 0 even
. That is, don't return
prematurely at all.
ok... I'll send a v2
--
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
, dolt
real1m58.653s
user6m20.523s
sys 0m28.920s
--
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:37 PM, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:33:19PM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:58 PM, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 har
---
src/libsystemd/libsystemd.sym.m4 | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd/libsystemd.sym.m4 b/src/libsystemd/libsystemd.sym.m4
index 19a49f4..41418b9 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd/libsystemd.sym.m4
+++ b/src/libsystemd/libsystemd.sym.m4
@@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ global:
by systemd during startup, but
the module will only be loaded by the kernel when some one actually
try to use them.
$ ls /dev/loop-control
/dev/loop-control
$ lsmod | grep loop
$ touch /dev/loop-control
$ lsmod | grep loop
loop 26560 0
--
Lucas De Marchi
load until it's needed I very much prefer the static
nodes approach we have. Shouldn't this be used instead of filling
modules-load-d with lots of entries?
I really miss numbers here and more information on which modules are
taking long because they are serialized.
--
Lucas De Marchi
De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
=3ba7f59e84857eb4dbe56a68fc7a3ffe8a650393
for a shorter and faster version of this.
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
where the value between ? and : is
inherited from the test itself... nice!
this is an extension: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Conditionals.html
As far as I know it's supported both by clang and gcc
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
to the library is kind of an workaround
for people doing initrd needing their tools to be statically linked.
As usual, shortlog is below.
Cheers
Lucas De Marchi
---
Jan Engelhardt (1):
depmod: add missing else clause
Lucas De Marchi (15):
tools: Do not link dynamically with libkmod
Use
in this release. Shortlog is below.
Cheers
Lucas De Marchi
---
Chengwei Yang (2):
Several minor fixes for documentation
Add document for exported enums
Jan Luebbe (1):
libkmod: Avoid calling syscall() with -1
Johannes Berg (1):
modprobe: don't check refcount with remove command
I think it
could be acceptable upstream.
Another option is... while building systemd, you could achieve
something similar to (2) above without the trouble of modifying
libkmod.a by passing -Wl,--exclude-libs,ALL in LDFLAGS (untested).
Lucas De Marchi
proposed:
http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2013:boot_and_core_os
which sounds pretty close to fastboot?
What if we merge the proposals?
John, are you ok with proposing (some of) these topics in the Boot
and Core OS track? I could help with the module-related part, too.
Lucas De Marchi
CAP_MKNOD from udev?
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
kmod_cmd kmod_cmd_static_nodes = {
+ .name = static-nodes,
+ .cmd = do_static_nodes,
+ .help = outputs the static-node information of the currently running
kernel,
+};
--
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel
when you get used to it ;-)
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
. I didn't really use it, though
Lucas De Marchi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Hi William,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, William Hubbs w.d.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
on source-based distros like gentoo or lfs, and on distros that do not
Don't you have the ability to split the built package in gentoo?
Lucas De Marchi
This macro comes from kernel and it's useful for unwrapping structs
inside another one. The generated code is actually the same to the one
where this logic is used in udev, but using this macro is much cleaner
and less error prone.
---
src/shared/util.h | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11
---
src/libudev/libudev-list.c |8 ++--
src/udev/collect/collect.c |8 ++--
src/udev/udevd.c | 16
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libudev/libudev-list.c b/src/libudev/libudev-list.c
index 1fe46f3..aec334b 100644
---
---
Makefile.am |1 +
configure.ac |7 +--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 8f736d0..0829f06 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ AM_CPPFLAGS = \
-I $(top_srcdir)/src/systemd
AM_CFLAGS
, it will autodetect with
pkg-config.
Am I missing something? I don't see a reason to change this behavior
and lots of packages already use this. E.g., packages may use
--with-systemdsystemunitdir= in 'make distcheck' rule in order to
not break dist.
Lucas De Marchi
There's already a condition that gives a warning if user is
cross-compiling an relying on files from the build system. AC_CHECK_FILE
macro only tests for file in the build system. Hence use a simple
'test -f' that does the same job, without the warning.
---
configure.ac | 14 +++---
1
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 16.11.10 11:47, Lucas De Marchi (lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi) wrote:
Vala is actually not required for building the tarball, since the
tarball includes generated code. However, we do require people who
32 matches
Mail list logo
