On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
I'm cc'ing a few
On Thu, 05.06.14 20:01, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
Hmm? You should exec the real daemon binary at the end, not just fork
it off. That wait the shell script process is replaced by the daemon
binary, which is what you want.
I tried both just running it and also running exec
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives on
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
in
On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives on the
ExecStart= line of a systemd service unit file, alternative ideas are of
I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives on the
ExecStart= line of a systemd service unit file, alternative ideas are of
course welcomed. I'm also Cc'ing systemd-devel as this subject was
