Hello Kyungmin,
Kyungmin Park [2015-04-21 9:21 +0900]:
At mobile. some daemon is not doing exact daemon task. it acts like
app. so it's kill-able based on priority. now it can't know it's idle
or not. In the app-like daemon developer, they don't want to exit
since performance reason. but in
My two cents is feature can be implemented as long as we get support
from the application. For example sd-event has the builtin support to
quit when it is idle. Systemd can pass the exit-on-idle timeout to the
application via env variables so the event loop can configure itself
to quit.
I am not
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
So I see no use case for idle timer based cleanup. Can you please
explain why they are better than on-demand cleanup?
We do it on Pantheon's infrastructure because many daemons have a
resource footprint that is more
On Tue, 21.04.15 07:56, Kyungmin Park (kmp...@infradead.org) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 20.04.15 23:56, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
If a service does not consume CPU during some time(can be configured
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 21.04.15 07:56, Kyungmin Park (kmp...@infradead.org) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 20.04.15 23:56, WaLyong Cho
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 20.04.15 23:56, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
If a service does not consume CPU during some time(can be configured
by ExitOnIdleSec=) and set to stopped on idle state(ExitOnIdle=), the
On Tue, 21.04.15 09:21, Kyungmin Park (kmp...@infradead.org) wrote:
Well, we should make sure to not encourage people to write
suboptimal. And such an external timer-based notification is
necessarily suboptimal code: a well-behaving daemon would set a timer
the moment it notices it is
This will be nice to have.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:56 AM WaLyong Cho walyong@samsung.com
wrote:
If a service does not consume CPU during some time(can be configured
by ExitOnIdleSec=) and set to stopped on idle state(ExitOnIdle=), the
service will be stopped. This can be useful if the
On Mon, 20.04.15 23:56, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
If a service does not consume CPU during some time(can be configured
by ExitOnIdleSec=) and set to stopped on idle state(ExitOnIdle=), the
service will be stopped. This can be useful if the service provides
some of
If a service does not consume CPU during some time(can be configured
by ExitOnIdleSec=) and set to stopped on idle state(ExitOnIdle=), the
service will be stopped. This can be useful if the service provides
some of activation methods.
---
src/core/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 | 2 +
On 04/21/2015 12:10 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 20.04.15 23:56, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
If a service does not consume CPU during some time(can be configured
by ExitOnIdleSec=) and set to stopped on idle state(ExitOnIdle=), the
service will be stopped. This can
11 matches
Mail list logo
