On Thu, 23.01.14 11:27, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
Has anyone looked at using socketat() for this? It's unclear whether
that syscall actually exists in any supported form; it's certainly not
documented.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/407495/
I don't think this has
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 23.01.14 11:27, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
Has anyone looked at using socketat() for this? It's unclear whether
that syscall actually exists in any supported form; it's
Has anyone looked at using socketat() for this? It's unclear whether
that syscall actually exists in any supported form; it's certainly not
documented.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/407495/
___
systemd-devel mailing list
2014/1/23 David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net:
Has anyone looked at using socketat() for this? It's unclear whether
that syscall actually exists in any supported form; it's certainly not
documented.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/407495/
grep -ir socketat linux-3.12 doesn't return
On Fri, 17.01.14 17:11, Alex Polvi (a...@polvi.net) wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to have a .socket bind in a particular network
namespace? The use case is to have a container with isolated
networking be able to start a service, or tunnel to a remote service,
that exists outside the
2014/1/18 Alex Polvi a...@polvi.net:
Hello,
Is there a way to have a .socket bind in a particular network
namespace? The use case is to have a container with isolated
networking be able to start a service, or tunnel to a remote service,
that exists outside the containers namespace.
Thank
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/18 Alex Polvi a...@polvi.net:
Hello,
Is there a way to have a .socket bind in a particular network
namespace? The use case is to have a container with isolated
networking be able to start a service, or
JoinsNamespaceOf= probably only works for services because of how
namespace setup gets done just before forking off a process. I think a
socket get created in the namespace of the process instantiating it.
I'm not sure there's actually a way for PID 1 systemd to set up a
socket in a namespace
Hello,
Is there a way to have a .socket bind in a particular network
namespace? The use case is to have a container with isolated
networking be able to start a service, or tunnel to a remote service,
that exists outside the containers namespace.
Thank you for any leads. I could not find anything
