Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Arbitrary restrictions (e.g. for RuntimeDirectory)

2019-05-13 Thread František Šumšal
On 5/13/19 8:20 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> "systemd‑analyze verify" exists. Since a long long time. > > Not really: You can't verify a unit file while it's not "installed". Comare it > to validating an XML file, for example. > That's actually not true. The argument for `systemd-analyze verify`

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Arbitrary restrictions (e.g. for RuntimeDirectory)

2019-05-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.05.19 um 08:20 schrieb Ulrich Windl: >> Note that "/var/run" is a legacy alias for "/run". It's highly >> recommended not to use the former anymore. > > It it because you don't like sub-directories, or is it to save four bytes? > ;-) stop it - if you would have read IT news

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Arbitrary restrictions (e.g. for RuntimeDirectory)

2019-05-13 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 09.05.2019 um 17:20 in Nachricht <20190509152036.GB5854@gardel-login>: > On Do, 09.05.19 12:22, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de) wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I had to subscribe to this list, even though I'm no systemd >> fan. Still I'll have to deal

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Arbitrary restrictions (e.g. for RuntimeDirectory)

2019-05-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 09.05.2019 um 16:54 in Nachricht <399aa684-a6bf-af19-dd09-bd670ec60...@gmail.com>: > 09.05.2019 13:22, Ulrich Windl пишет: >> Hi! >> >> I had to subscribe to this list, even though I'm no systemd fan. Still I'll > have to deal with it as the distribution we use