[systemd-devel] Considering fuse+sshfs mounts as network

2012-01-11 Thread Colin Guthrie
Hi, I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab which is messing up their boot. Obviously they can add noauto but then their argument is that they do want them to be automatically mounted... I'm sure there are other ways to solve this, but by the same token, there already

Re: [systemd-devel] Considering fuse+sshfs mounts as network

2012-01-11 Thread Karel Zak
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:24:51AM +, Colin Guthrie wrote: I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab which is messing up their boot. Obviously they can add noauto but then their argument is that they do want them to be automatically mounted... I'm sure there are

Re: [systemd-devel] Considering fuse+sshfs mounts as network

2012-01-11 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:24:51 + Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: Hi, I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab which is messing up their boot. Obviously they can add noauto but then their argument is that they do want them to be automatically mounted...

Re: [systemd-devel] Considering fuse+sshfs mounts as network

2012-01-11 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Karel Zak at 11/01/12 12:13 did gyre and gimble: man fstab: mount(8) and umount(8) support filesystem subtypes. The subtype is defined by '.subtype' suffix. For example 'fuse.sshfs'. It's recommended to use subtype notation rather than add any prefix to the first