Re: [systemd-devel] Immutable Images: Single Data Patition

2023-03-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 03.03.23 10:09, Lennart Poettering (mzq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > > > And suddenly we'd have a spec that would be particularly powerful > > > and generic: you could use it for subvols, for dirs, or for > > > loopback files, and mix and match freely, and it would always > > > behave somewhat

Re: [systemd-devel] Immutable Images: Single Data Patition

2023-03-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 02.03.23 16:59, Adrian Vovk (adrianv...@gmail.com) wrote: > > /home/ with dm-integrity or OPAL for trust, TPM-bound, with homed managed > > homedirs inside that do encryption > > How big is the dm-integrity write performance hit? My understanding is > that it is 2x slower, though I don't

Re: [systemd-devel] Immutable Images: Single Data Patition

2023-02-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 21.02.23 16:50, Adrian Vovk (adrianv...@gmail.com) wrote: > Part of the A/B approach involves two classes of user data partitions: > ones that are encrypted (/var, /etc) and ones that are not (/home). > I'll be adding an additional partition to the non-encrypted category, > as part of my

[systemd-devel] Immutable Images: Single Data Patition

2023-02-21 Thread Adrian Vovk
Hello everyone! Quick background: I'm working on carbonOS, a Desktop Linux distro that's implementing your "GnomeBook" OS concept. I've stumbled upon some limitations and would like to discuss solutions w/ the community. Please see my previous email for a little more context. This email is going