Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-09 Thread Michał Zegan
W dniu 09.04.2020 o 10:23, Pekka Paalanen pisze: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:46:08 +0200 > Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> On Fr, 03.04.20 10:28, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: >> My (maybe bad) guess is that it would need to be addressed in the kernel though And the

Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-09 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:46:08 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fr, 03.04.20 10:28, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > My (maybe bad) guess is that it would need to be addressed in the kernel > > > though > > > And the CanMultiSession attribute on non-seat0 doesn't matter

Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 03.04.20 10:28, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > My (maybe bad) guess is that it would need to be addressed in the kernel > > though > > And the CanMultiSession attribute on non-seat0 doesn't matter when the > > problem > > is all input from all devices gets sent to seat0

Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 02.04.20 22:59, nerdopolis (bluescreen_aven...@verizon.net) wrote: > Thanks. I was wondering if there was some security thing that depended on TTYs > for the two Display Servers running on the same seat to truly be secure or > not. > (like reading /dev/input/* ) The input subsystem has

Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-07 Thread nerdopolis
On Friday, April 3, 2020 3:28:52 AM EDT Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 22:59:25 -0400 > nerdopolis wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:59:30 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Di, 28.01.20 22:48, nerdopolis (bluescreen_aven...@verizon.net) wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > >

Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 22:59:25 -0400 nerdopolis wrote: > On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:59:30 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 28.01.20 22:48, nerdopolis (bluescreen_aven...@verizon.net) wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Sorry if this is the wrong place for this. I can't seem to find a

Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-02 Thread nerdopolis
On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:59:30 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 28.01.20 22:48, nerdopolis (bluescreen_aven...@verizon.net) wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Sorry if this is the wrong place for this. I can't seem to find a > > system-user > > mailing list for this purpose on freedesktop. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-03-31 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 28.01.20 22:48, nerdopolis (bluescreen_aven...@verizon.net) wrote: > Hi > > Sorry if this is the wrong place for this. I can't seem to find a system-user > mailing list for this purpose on freedesktop. > > So I am curious about what CanMultiSession=no means, as I am able to start a >

[systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-01-28 Thread nerdopolis
Hi Sorry if this is the wrong place for this. I can't seem to find a system-user mailing list for this purpose on freedesktop. So I am curious about what CanMultiSession=no means, as I am able to start a Weston session on a secondary seat (eg seat1 if I set up the hardware with udev or