On 11/7/22 18:35, Barry Scott wrote:
I do not know enough about how that works.
I just tested something like this (as a proof of concept) :
f5.sh root:root/0700 in /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/
#!/bin/bash
usage()
{
local EXIT_VALUE=$1
echo "usage: "$SCRIPT_NAME" "
exit
> On 7 Nov 2022, at 10:24, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/6/22 22:30, Barry wrote:
>
>
>> So a dirty hack is to replace /sbin/resolvconf with a script that
>> does-the-right-thing.
>> Uses resolvectl on the correct interface etc. But only when called by F5.
>
> Hello,
>
> thanks
On 11/6/22 22:30, Barry wrote:
So a dirty hack is to replace /sbin/resolvconf with a script that
does-the-right-thing.
Uses resolvectl on the correct interface etc. But only when called by F5.
Hello,
thanks for your answer.
I just do it manually for now. But maybe one could user NM
On 11/6/22 18:24, Petr Menšík wrote:
Oh, understood. Then it is specific problem to Fedora, because I think
other distributions do not use systemd's implementation of resolvconf
binary.
Hello,
thanks for your answer
I think original Debian resolvconf package does not use -a interface
> On 2 Nov 2022, at 15:20, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
>
> On 10/31/22 12:19, Petr Menšík wrote:
>
> Hello, thank you and Barry as well for your answers
>
>
>> I would suggest using strace to find what exactly it does and what it tries
>> to modify. I expect sources for that client are not
Oh, understood. Then it is specific problem to Fedora, because I think
other distributions do not use systemd's implementation of resolvconf
binary.
I think original Debian resolvconf package does not use -a interface
parameter for anything serious. It just uses the same interface
identifier
On 10/31/22 12:19, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hello, thank you and Barry as well for your answers
I would suggest using strace to find what exactly it does and what it
tries to modify. I expect sources for that client are not available.
Well, digging a little deeper, here's what I've found out:
1)
On 10/26/22 20:44, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is a systemd-resolved or NetworkManager question
but it involves both (I know Thomas HALLER is a member of this list too)
on
Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six) using the following kernel and packages
> On 26 Oct 2022, at 20:17, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure if this is a systemd-resolved or NetworkManager question but it
> involves both (I know Thomas HALLER is a member of this list too)
>
> on
>
> Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six) using the following kernel and
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is a systemd-resolved or NetworkManager question
but it involves both (I know Thomas HALLER is a member of this list too)
on
Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six) using the following kernel and packages
5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
10 matches
Mail list logo
