Re: [systemd-devel] unit names in systemd log entries

On Wed, Jan 11 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2017-01-11 15:41 GMT+01:00 Yuri D'Elia : >> The description is fine for looking at the status of a service (as the >> unit name is right there), but it does not help in the log, since I have >> to go and look which unit has the same

Re: [systemd-devel] unit names in systemd log entries

Am 11.01.2017 um 16:11 schrieb Yuri D'Elia: On Wed, Jan 11 2017, Reindl Harald wrote: The description is fine for looking at the status of a service (as the unit name is right there), but it does not help in the log, since I have to go and look which unit has the same description

Re: [systemd-devel] unit names in systemd log entries

On Wed, Jan 11 2017, Reindl Harald wrote: >> The description is fine for looking at the status of a service (as the >> unit name is right there), but it does not help in the log, since I have >> to go and look which unit has the same description (essentially, I have >> to grep). The unit name is

[systemd-devel] unit names in systemd log entries

When systemd is generating log entries for some units, it writes the human description in the syslog: systemd[xy]: Starting GnuPG cryptographic agent... systemd[xy]: Stopping GnuPG cryptographic agent... systemd[xy]: Closing GnuPG cryptographic agent... however, over time I've found this