On Sat, 02.03.13 15:00, Michal Sekletar (sekleta...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mar 1, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 20.02.13 14:50, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
All Execs within the service, will get mounted the same /tmp and
On Sun, 03.03.13 19:06, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
I can't find any documentation on how service names get encoded for
DBus. It looks pretty close to URL encoding with underscores instead
of percent signs.
If I can get a definitive answer, I'll update the wiki. If I
On Sat, 02.03.13 00:31, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Hi Tom,
just to clarify:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:49:53PM -0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
+ExecStart=/usr/bin/systemctl --no-block --force
Hi,
I have a unit file which does something like this:
In ExecStartPre - Start A
In ExecStart - Start B
Now the thing is B depends on A to function correctly and A is a binary itself.
The behavior I am seeing is a little obvious but still I thought there might be
a way around this. When the
Heya,
if you commit something and it was previously posted on this ML, then
please please make sure to reply to the mail on the ML that you commited
it -- even if the original mail was your own! A short reply just saying
Commited. is totally sufficient. For patch series make clear if you
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:02:36AM +, Belal, Awais wrote:
Hi,
I have a unit file which does something like this:
In ExecStartPre - Start A
In ExecStart - Start B
Now the thing is B depends on A to function correctly and A is a binary
itself. The behavior I am seeing is a little
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Belal, Awais awais_be...@mentor.com wrote:
I have a unit file which does something like this:
In ExecStartPre - Start A
In ExecStart - Start B
Now the thing is B depends on A to function correctly and A is a binary
itself. The behavior I am seeing is a little
Hi,
So how do i write such a service i.e. when A starts B should be started first
and when A is stopped B should be stopped as well. I am really new to this so
any pointers here would be really helpful. I understand that this is a very
basic question but I am very new to this...
Regards
2013/3/4 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/3 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
2013/3/3 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
That said, I can prep a follow-up
2013/3/2 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
2013/3/2 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
I decided to split up the large completion file instead of using symlinks.
The duplication is minimal and by splitting up, the files become much
more readable and we only need to actually install those bits which
On Mon, 04.03.13 15:25, Belal, Awais (awais_be...@mentor.com) wrote:
Hi,
So how do i write such a service i.e. when A starts B should be
started first and when A is stopped B should be stopped as well. I am
really new to this so any pointers here would be really helpful. I
understand
On Sat, 02.03.13 11:06, Stefan G. Weichinger (li...@xunil.at) wrote:
Am 01.03.2013 19:39, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
Can you provide the log where this happens? Boot with
systemd.log_level=debug and provide us with the journalctl output around
where this problem happens.
I put up
On 04/03/13 14:31, Lennart Poettering wrote:
So here's how to do this, it's very simple: every char outside of the
A-Za-z0-9 range is escaped as _XY where XY is the numeric code of the
char, as 2 char lower-case hex value. Note that _ itself is also
escaped, to _5f.
This sounds a lot like
Am 04.03.2013 19:05, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
This looks like your LVM/DM implementation is borked (compiled without
udev support?).
lvm2-2.02.98 with udev-197 compiled in ... recompiled right now, still
waiting for timeout at boot.
Please reporting this to the LVM/DM folks, this is
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:15:28PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:27:24PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:03:59PM +0100,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:01:01PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 04.03.13 15:25, Belal, Awais (awais_be...@mentor.com) wrote:
Hi,
So how do i write such a service i.e. when A starts B should be
started first and when A is stopped B should be stopped as well. I am
really
On Mon, 04.03.13 10:43, Harald Hoyer (har...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
+if (initrd) {
+char _cleanup_free_ *mu = NULL, *name = NULL;
+/* Skip generation, if unit already exists */
+name =
On Mon, 04.03.13 20:09, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=8330847e949fc0c26b16910e5240eef1fe2c330a
I would have preferred if this patch had been posted on the ML first
before it was commited.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering -
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Simon McVittie
simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Before freezing this as ABI, you might want to consider a couple of the more
subtle points from that function
Considering that those two suggestions cover cases not yet handled by
systemd's still-informal
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
please review
Could you comment on why this is necessary? It would be nice if we
could reuse as much as possible from the real root rather than making
initrd-spcific files, but perhaps it is not possible in
We're about to code a Python wrapper for systemd's DBus functionality.
Initially, it will be non-comprehensive and satisfy our internal
Pantheon goal of reading fields on a service and manipulating services
without forking and parsing systemctl output to do either.
But, a clean, incomplete
Am 05.03.2013 06:26, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
please review
Could you comment on why this is necessary? It would be nice if we
could reuse as much as possible from the real root rather than making
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
---
src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
b/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
index fade192..3b8329b 100644
---
... was the change in the priority ordering.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
This allows switch-root to work correctly if a unit is active both before and
after the switch-root, but its dependencies change. Before the patch, any
dependencies added to active units by switch-root will not be pulled, in
particular filesystems configured in /etc/fstab would not be activated if
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 05.03.2013 06:26, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
When we switch root we use JOB_REPLACE to default.target. This means
that units which are pulled in by default.target, but already active
in the initrd (such as
Am 05.03.2013 07:56, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
This allows switch-root to work correctly if a unit is active both before and
after the switch-root, but its dependencies change. Before the patch, any
dependencies added to active units by switch-root will not be pulled, in
particular filesystems
I Like the idea as well to have direct DBus access to systemd.
Regarding your example of the journal wrapper. Anybody knows the API to write
to the journal without using the C library? Is this DBus transport as well? Or
is there a special journal socket to write to?
--
Holger
### Sent from a
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 05.03.2013 07:56, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
This allows switch-root to work correctly if a unit is active both before and
after the switch-root, but its dependencies change. Before the patch, any
dependencies added to
Am 05.03.2013 08:08, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 05.03.2013 06:26, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
When we switch root we use JOB_REPLACE to default.target. This means
that units which are pulled in by default.target, but already
30 matches
Mail list logo
