Hi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Yuxuan Shui yshu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This mail might be a little bit later for the topic, but I would like
to share my thoughts anyway.
Before systemd 206 was released, there are a few users (I don't know
how many of them are there, but there's a page
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:11 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Yuxuan Shui yshu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This mail might be a little bit later for the topic, but I would like
to share my thoughts anyway.
Before systemd 206 was released,
Hi,
See http://bugs.debian.org/719695 for context.
This patch is not complete yet; at least masking/unmasking does not work
yet. Maybe I missed other verbs, too :).
Any feedback appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Michael
diff --git i/src/shared/install.c w/src/shared/install.c
index
Hi.
I'm asked to do the following upgrade procedure to a custom embedded
system: plug an USB drive and upgrade our application (that runs as a
systemd service) from the contents of the drive. Is a bit ugly, but is
a temporary workaround.
I've thought of doing it with:
1. Automounting USB drives
On host side :
/etc/systemd/network/70-dahlia.netdev ***
[Match]
Host=host0
Virtualization=container
[NetDev]
Name=br0
Kind=bridge
[Match]
Virtualization=container
*** /etc/systemd/network/80-dahlia.network ***
[Network]
DHCP=no
DNS=192.168.1.254
[Address]
Hi,
After reading some more mails and thinking about it a bit more, I seems to
have a better understanding.
I know that a per-user systemd is used to start service which should only
be started once for every user. But I also want systemd to be able to start
applications for every session (e.g.
Hi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Yuxuan Shui yshu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After reading some more mails and thinking about it a bit more, I seems to
have a better understanding.
I know that a per-user systemd is used to start service which should only be
started once for every user. But
On Friday 28 February 2014 02:28:20 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 28.02.14 02:21, Timothée Ravier (sios...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 26/02/2014 02:38, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 26.02.14 02:01, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
Upstream KDE patch is here:
On Sun, 02.03.14 23:37, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
The symlink is created in bindir (/usr/bin), and points to a binary
which lives in rootlibexecdir (/lib/systemd or /usr/lib/systemd). A
relative symlink does not work here.
---
Makefile.am | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Sun, 02.03.14 19:48, David Farning (dfarn...@gmail.com) wrote:
Over the last couple of weeks I have been looking over and testing the
systemd. Thanks for all the hard work and interesting ideas.
One issue that has come to mind is the quality and structure of the
documentation. The
On Mon, 03.03.14 11:52, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
But if you do this on an embedded system you can do
DefaultDependencies=no for all services where you want this and place
them manually?
Almost I can. Actually I can request to the package manager in our
system. But,
Make it more user friendly (e.g. without an open man page). Instead of
u root 0
g mail /usr/bin/procmail
g tty /usr/bin/write
d /var/lib/foobar 664 root root
c /etc/sudoers /usr/share/sudo/sudoers.default
user root 0
setgroup mail /usr/bin/procmail
... and so on.
Hmm,
On Mon, 03.03.14 10:29, Alejandro Exojo (aex...@modpow.es) wrote:
Hi.
I'm asked to do the following upgrade procedure to a custom embedded
system: plug an USB drive and upgrade our application (that runs as a
systemd service) from the contents of the drive. Is a bit ugly, but is
a
On Mon, 03.03.14 15:48, Holger Schurig (holgerschu...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hmm, that gave me one thougth: if systemd starts as PID 1 and no
/etc/passwd etc doesn't exist, I can very well understand that, when
compiled with --enable-privioning, it should create those things. But
the c -line could
On Mon, 03.03.14 15:30, Yuxuan Shui (yshu...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
That's why I'm writing this mail. I want to point out the reason
behind use systemd as a session manager, so you will probably
understand why I want to do this and help me. Since I can't get this
done by myself with my
On Mon, 03.03.14 19:16, Yuxuan Shui (yshu...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
After reading some more mails and thinking about it a bit more, I seems to
have a better understanding.
I know that a per-user systemd is used to start service which should only
be started once for every user. But I also
2014-03-03 15:32 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Sun, 02.03.14 23:37, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
The symlink is created in bindir (/usr/bin), and points to a binary
which lives in rootlibexecdir (/lib/systemd or /usr/lib/systemd). A
relative symlink does
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:16:28PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2014-03-03 16:12 GMT+01:00 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
This really sounds like we want to use ln's --relative option here, so
that the symlink is relative regardless what the setup is.
The patch looked ok to me as is, but
On Mon, 03.03.14 16:12, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
The patch looked ok to me as is, but I can certainly add a --relative
if you prefer.
Should
dbus1-generator-install-hook:
$(AM_V_at)$(MKDIR_P) $(DESTDIR)$(usergeneratordir)
$(AM_V_LN)$(LN_S) -f
On Sun, 02.03.14 23:55, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
I am still open for this btw. If somebody wants to hack on that, I
figure this should simply be addded to ExecContext, as a strv of
directory names. In exec_spawn() we'd then just create all those dirs,
right after
ping?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:02 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
The ObjectManager dbus interface provides an InterfacesAdded signal to
notify others about new interfaces that are added to an object. The same
signal is also used to advertise new objects (by adding the first
---
man/systemd-networkd.service.xml |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/systemd-networkd.service.xml b/man/systemd-networkd.service.xml
index 6ee8494..cb6afaa 100644
--- a/man/systemd-networkd.service.xml
+++ b/man/systemd-networkd.service.xml
@@ -74,7
On 03/02/2014 10:11 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
In kdbus_meta_append_*() we want to get the subjective context, so
instead of using __task_cred() which reference the objective cred,
use current_cred() to access the subjective cred.
Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org
---
Compile
Applied. Thanks!
-t
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
---
man/systemd-networkd.service.xml |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/systemd-networkd.service.xml
b/man/systemd-networkd.service.xml
index
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 03.03.14 16:12, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
The patch looked ok to me as is, but I can certainly add a --relative
if you prefer.
Should
dbus1-generator-install-hook:
Hi!
First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose IPC
layer; so that developers working on client-/server software will no longer
need to create their own homemade IPC by using primitives like sockets or
similar.
Now kdbus is advertised as high performance IPC
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld ste...@space.twc.de wrote:
First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose IPC
layer; so that developers working on client-/server software will no longer
need to create their own homemade IPC by using primitives like
On 03/03/2014 14:28, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Friday 28 February 2014 02:28:20 Lennart Poettering wrote:
They should just invoke the methods. If they get
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod,
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownObject or
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownInterface back they
I took a stab at a draft intro section for the fd.o wiki.
---
Systemd manages system startup and UNIX services. In recent years,
computers have become more dynamic. Servers are turned on and off to
balance performance and resource usage. Desktop hardware is attached
and detached as necessary.
Is anyone aware of any talks comparing systemd and launchd? Several of
the ground breaking ideas in systemd seem to come directly from
launchd. It would be interesting to hear about about why some ideas
were used and others were left behind.
I am not trying to second guess... just understand the
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld ste...@space.twc.de
wrote:
First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose
IPC
layer; so that developers working on client-/server software will no
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld ste...@space.twc.de
wrote:
First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose
IPC
32 matches
Mail list logo
