Dne 09. 07. 2014 17:06, piše Tom Gundersen:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov v.tols...@selfip.ru wrote:
As i see, networkd now able to do dhcpv6, what about configuring
interfaces to accept radv messages and configure it interfaces? What i
need to do on systemd-networkd side?
Dne 10. 07. 2014 08:14, piše brane2:
Dne 09. 07. 2014 17:06, piše Tom Gundersen:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov v.tols...@selfip.ru
wrote:
As i see, networkd now able to do dhcpv6, what about configuring
interfaces to accept radv messages and configure it interfaces? What i
Dne 10. 07. 2014 09:11, piše brane2:
Dne 10. 07. 2014 08:14, piše brane2:
Dne 09. 07. 2014 17:06, piše Tom Gundersen:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov
v.tols...@selfip.ru wrote:
As i see, networkd now able to do dhcpv6, what about configuring
interfaces to accept radv messages
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config file from
being executed, e.g. to block the creation of a certain user.
---
src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/sysusers/sysusers.c b/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
index 129493a1e7..68c552d24a
Hi,
Even though cpu.shares and cpu.cfs_period_us/cfs_quota_us parameters
are in the cpu cgroup, they can be turned off individually.
Our kernel only enables cpu.shares property and due to that we see
error messages.
systemd[1]: Failed to set cpu.cfs_period_us on
/system.slice/system-sshd.slice:
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 10/07/14 13:51 did
gyre and gimble:
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config file from
being executed, e.g. to block the creation of a certain user.
---
src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
'Twas brillig, and Tobias Geerinckx-Rice at 10/07/14 15:53 did gyre and
gimble:
On 10 July 2014 13:41, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 10/07/14 13:51 did
gyre and gimble:
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config
Am 10.07.2014 16:59, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 07/10/2014 12:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config file from
being executed, e.g. to block the creation of a certain user.
---
src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
1 file
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:59:10PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/10/2014 12:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config file from
being executed, e.g. to block the creation of a certain user.
---
On 07/10/2014 03:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.07.2014 16:59, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 07/10/2014 12:51 PM, Zbigniew Je;drzejewski-Szmek wrote:
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config file from
being executed, e.g. to block the creation of a certain user.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:41:14PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I guess this is probably OK, but isn't it a bit counter intuitive? I
mean one of the reasons for sysuser is due to /etc/ being bootstrapped.
In this case I'd have thought that looking in /etc/ is a bit weird.
This probably wouldn't
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:18:15PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I don't use RPM, but having your system's user policy consist of
running useradd in a pre-installation script seems... sub-optimal.
It is :)
But sadly that's the way it's been done for a while, but now that there
is a
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2014 07:31 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Tom Gundersen
Patches look good. Only found one tiny nit. We should come up with a
better name though, feels wrong that the name is very generic (and
clashes
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2014 07:31 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Tom Gundersen
Patches look good. Only found one tiny nit. We should come up with a
better
On 07/10/2014 04:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:59:10PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/10/2014 12:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config file from
being executed, e.g. to block
On 07/10/2014 05:06 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2014 07:31 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Tom Gundersen
Patches look good. Only found one
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 06:43:26PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/10/2014 04:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:59:10PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/10/2014 12:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
An administrator might want to
On 07/10/2014 07:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 06:43:26PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/10/2014 04:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:59:10PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/10/2014 12:51 PM, Zbigniew
On Thu, 10.07.14 14:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
An administrator might want to block a certain sysusers config file from
being executed, e.g. to block the creation of a certain user.
---
src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff
On Thu, 10.07.14 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Seeing this list, why not name the variable Tier= ? Or
DeploymentTier=, if just Tier is too specific?
This is specific for defining staging environment not their layer so
can I simple get an ack nack on the deployment
]] Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 10.07.14 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Seeing this list, why not name the variable Tier= ? Or
DeploymentTier=, if just Tier is too specific?
This is specific for defining staging environment not their layer so
can I simple
On 07/10/2014 08:44 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 10.07.14 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Seeing this list, why not name the variable Tier= ? Or
DeploymentTier=, if just Tier is too specific?
This is specific for defining staging environment not their layer
On 07/10/2014 08:53 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 10.07.14 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Seeing this list, why not name the variable Tier= ? Or
DeploymentTier=, if just Tier is too specific?
This is specific for defining staging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I'm having a problem on a fedora 20 Xen guest that freezes systemd
with an assertion failed message and bootup stops at that point:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116510
Is anyone aware of this problem and knows of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I'm having a problem on a fedora 20 Xen guest that freezes systemd
with an assertion failed message and bootup stops at that point:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116510
Is anyone aware of this problem and knows of a
On Thu, 10.07.14 21:04, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 07/10/2014 08:44 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 10.07.14 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Seeing this list, why not name the variable Tier= ? Or
DeploymentTier=, if just Tier is
On 07/10/2014 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 10.07.14 21:04, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 07/10/2014 08:44 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 10.07.14 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Seeing this list, why not name the
Hello folks,
Apologies if anybody is getting this message twice; I originally posted on
d...@lists.freedesktop.org and was directed here.
I am attempting to listen to the SessionRemoved signal from the login
manager http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/logind/. I have
no trouble in
28 matches
Mail list logo
