On Thu, 15.01.15 12:14, Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello,
The last big issue I'm running into when running systemd in an
unprivileged LXC container is that it's crashing on an assert in the
shutdown/reboot path right after unmounting all devices.
That's because due to
2014-12-30 0:22 GMT+01:00 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@google.com:
Move units/machines.target from nodist_systemunit_DATA to
dist_systemunit_DATA,
since it's not a generated file. Otherwise, `make clean` would remove the
committed copy of the file.
Tested that `./autogen.sh c` will not
Hello,
The last big issue I'm running into when running systemd in an
unprivileged LXC container is that it's crashing on an assert in the
shutdown/reboot path right after unmounting all devices.
That's because due to mknod not being allowed inside a user namespace,
we have to bind-mount all the
Hey Robert,
thanks for working on this!
Robert Milasan [2015-01-15 15:24 +0100]:
+err = execl(/bin/umount, /bin/umount,
node, NULL);
If this succeeds, umount will completely take over the process, and
cdrom_id is gone.
This also isn't sufficient if there are multiple
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Robert Milasan rmila...@suse.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:05:54 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
I think the best way to fix this is in the kernel properly. And if the
kernel folks are not willing to do add code for that, then I
Thanks to both. Pushed!
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Susant Sahani sus...@redhat.com wrote:
The Zyxel switch sends port subtype as Locally assigned (7).
Add LLDP_PORT_SUBTYPE_LOCALLY_ASSIGNED as supported type
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:05:54 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
I think the best way to fix this is in the kernel properly. And if the
kernel folks are not willing to do add code for that, then I think
it's still better to make sure systemd unmounts it. It can do so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Tom,
I will be happy to run different tests, but I need a serious amount of
handholding, as I haven't done this kind of work for ages...
You could start with how I run it through Valgrind... (which I do have
installed, but no clue how to use
---
src/shared/missing.h | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/missing.h b/src/shared/missing.h
index cdc38b2..d074405 100644
--- a/src/shared/missing.h
+++ b/src/shared/missing.h
@@ -79,6 +79,12 @@
#define F_SEAL_WRITE0x0008 /* prevent writes */
#endif
While not common outside of BIND configs the implied top level '.' in
domains is commonly accepted and crops up in random places. Starting
with commit 784d9b9c networkd began validating domains as hostnames
which rejects trailing dots, breaking short name resolution in some
environments such as
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:20:55PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 15.01.15 12:14, Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello,
The last big issue I'm running into when running systemd in an
unprivileged LXC container is that it's crashing on an assert in the
Hello all,
Robert Milasan [2015-01-12 9:39 +0100]:
1. add a CD/DVD into the driver
2. mount the driver: mount /dev/sr0 /mnt/my_cd (ensure you don't
use the Gnome/KDE auto-mounting or reproduce this in a server setup)
3. eject the media (using the hardware button) and add a new one media
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hello all,
Robert Milasan [2015-01-12 9:39 +0100]:
1. add a CD/DVD into the driver
2. mount the driver: mount /dev/sr0 /mnt/my_cd (ensure you don't
use the Gnome/KDE auto-mounting or reproduce this in a server
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Susant Sahani sus...@redhat.com wrote:
The Zyxel switch sends port subtype as Locally assigned (7).
Add LLDP_PORT_SUBTYPE_LOCALLY_ASSIGNED as supported type
reported by Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com
---
src/libsystemd-network/lldp-internal.c | 1 +
1
Steve Dickson wrote on 15/01/15 00:50:
Hello,
On 01/12/2015 04:43 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
But FWIW, your check for whether systemctl is installed via calling
systemctl --help is IMO not very neat.
If you're using bash here anyway, you might as well just do a:
if [ -d
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:38 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Oliver Neukum [2015-01-15 11:31 +0100]:
No, the events are generated. And it is processed.
There is just no unmounting.
That sounds like a bug/missing feature in cdrom_id --eject-media then.
You could try and replace it with
On 01/14/2015 10:46 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
v2:
* Corrected the numerous BindTo typos
Here are a few systemd changes that were suggested
by the systemd folks:
* Bind the nfs-idmap service to the nfs server.
* Correctly bind nfs-mountd service to the nfs server.
* Used
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:38:33 +0100
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Oliver Neukum [2015-01-15 11:31 +0100]:
No, the events are generated. And it is processed.
There is just no unmounting.
That sounds like a bug/missing feature in cdrom_id --eject-media then.
You could try and
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 09:03 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
- udev rules (60-cdrom_id.rules) picks that up and calls eject
/dev/srX on the device; the eject program takes care to unmount
everything before physical ejection.
Note that the kernel will *not* generate DISK_EJECT_REQUEST uevents
Oliver Neukum [2015-01-15 11:31 +0100]:
No, the events are generated. And it is processed.
There is just no unmounting.
That sounds like a bug/missing feature in cdrom_id --eject-media then.
You could try and replace it with /usr/bin/eject, which does the
unmounting of all partitions first,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:39:36 +0100
Robert Milasan rmila...@suse.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:31:48 +0100
Oliver Neukum oneu...@suse.de wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 09:03 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
- udev rules (60-cdrom_id.rules) picks that up and calls eject
/dev/srX on the
Ross Lagerwall wrote on 14/01/15 22:41:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:04:35PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:34:07 +
Colin Guthrie co...@mageia.org пишет:
Anyway, assuming the process is in the .mount unit cgroup, should
systemd detect the umount and kill the
Hi,
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 16:37 +0100, Barbara Lazarowicz-Steube wrote:
As you can see in it, having received the RA networkd correctly
identifies the local network as managed and fires up the DHCPv6
client. The client then receives a reply from the server and... does
absolutely
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:22:50 +0100
Robert Milasan rmila...@suse.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:00:15 +0100
Oliver Neukum oneu...@suse.de wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:38 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Oliver Neukum [2015-01-15 11:31 +0100]:
No, the events are generated. And it is
Hi all,
Is it true that readahead collector defaults to only collect files
within root filesystem?
If so, is it possible to instruct it to also collect for e.g. /home
(mounted on a separate media)?
This is not mentioned anywhere in the docs. It probably should be?
Thank you,
Nikolai
El 15/01/15 a las 09:38, Nikolai Zhubr escribió:
Hi all,
Is it true that readahead collector defaults to only collect files
within root filesystem?
If so, is it possible to instruct it to also collect for e.g. /home
(mounted on a separate media)?
This is not mentioned anywhere in the docs. It
Hi
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:47:19PM +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
This rule is only run on tablet/touchscreen devices, and extracts their size
in millimeters, as it can be found out through their struct
On 2015-01-15 09:58, Patrik Flykt wrote:
Indeed. I so thought I had a patch applied that set the DHCPv6 address
for the interface. Apparently such functionality has gone into /dev/null
instead, and as a result you will need the next version of the DHCPv6
address assignment patch recently
On 15.01.2015 10:28, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Although if the script is in bash I'd use if [ -d ... rather than if
test -d ... as (and bash experts (Harald?) can correct me here if I'm
wrong) I believe [ is a bash built in (even if it is a binary in
/usr/bin/), whereas it would have to fork out
On 15/01/15 09:28, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Although if the script is in bash I'd use if [ -d ... rather than if
test -d ... as (and bash experts (Harald?) can correct me here if I'm
wrong) I believe [ is a bash built in (even if it is a binary in
/usr/bin/), whereas it would have to fork out to
Hi,
15.01.2015 16:07, Cristian Rodríguez:
The readahead collector is no longer included in systemd.
Hm. It is still there in not-very-old opensuse 13.2 ...
Anyway. Where has it gone then? Is it a separate tool now or got
obsoleted by something else?
I actually just started to like it...
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:40 schrieb Nikolai Zhubr:
15.01.2015 16:07, Cristian Rodríguez:
The readahead collector is no longer included in systemd.
Hm. It is still there in not-very-old opensuse 13.2 ...
Anyway. Where has it gone then? Is it a separate tool now or got
obsoleted by something else?
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:31:22PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:40 schrieb Nikolai Zhubr:
15.01.2015 16:07, Cristian Rodríguez:
The readahead collector is no longer included in systemd.
Hm. It is still there in
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:31:22PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:40 schrieb Nikolai Zhubr:
15.01.2015 16:07, Cristian Rodríguez:
The readahead collector is no longer included in systemd.
Hm. It is still there in not-very-old opensuse 13.2 ...
Anyway. Where has it gone
El jue, 15-01-2015 a las 14:38 +0100, Reindl Harald escribió:
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:31:22PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:40 schrieb Nikolai Zhubr:
15.01.2015 16:07, Cristian Rodríguez:
The readahead
El 15/01/15 a las 10:40, Nikolai Zhubr escribió:
Hi,
15.01.2015 16:07, Cristian Rodríguez:
The readahead collector is no longer included in systemd.
Hm. It is still there in not-very-old opensuse 13.2 ...
for whatever reason, current openSUSE releases have systemd 210.. that's
old.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:31:22PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 14:40 schrieb Nikolai Zhubr:
15.01.2015 16:07, Cristian Rodríguez:
The
Hi,
15.01.2015 16:31, Reindl Harald:
[...]
it was completly removed with no replacement by assuming eveorybody in a
short term will use only SSD drives
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-August/022002.html
Thanks.
The reasoning may well be valid, but this still does not
Signed-off-by: Robert Milasan rmila...@suse.com
---
src/udev/cdrom_id/cdrom_id.c | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/udev/cdrom_id/cdrom_id.c b/src/udev/cdrom_id/cdrom_id.c
index 6052f6a..72a1357 100644
--- a/src/udev/cdrom_id/cdrom_id.c
В Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:36:33 +0100
Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com пишет:
Andrei Borzenkov [2015-01-15 11:24 +0300]:
So what's the point of locking tray in the first place if it will be
unlocked as soon as you press eject button?
So that we can do a clean unmount and avoid the situation
40 matches
Mail list logo
