On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Michael Chapman wrote:
[...]
> Note that when you're using Pacemaker to manage a systemd service, you
> should not enable the service in the normal way -- that is, the service
> should not be started simply by virtue of it being in the Wants= list of
> multi-user.target. The
>>> Michael Chapman schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 09:15 in
Nachricht <20675743-9521-cdca-1c58-d42de7117...@very.puzzling.org>:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Michael Chapman wrote:
> [...]
>> Note that when you're using Pacemaker to manage a systemd service, you
>> should not enable the service in the normal
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 10:14 in
Nachricht
:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks and "back to the mess": If I use libvirtd.service instead of
>> libvirtd-tls.socket, it does *not* open the TLS socket, even though the
>> configuration file
>>> Michael Chapman schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 09:09 in
Nachricht :
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> [...]
>> As for the drop‑ins: I neither know what those are expected to do, not who
>> adds them at run time. See "documentation"...
>
> The 50‑pacemaker.conf drop‑ins are, as their name
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> Thanks and "back to the mess": If I use libvirtd.service instead of
> libvirtd-tls.socket, it does *not* open the TLS socket, even though the
> configuration file contains "listen_tls=1"...
libvirtd --listen
Did you read the link I gave
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
> >
> > libvirt can be run without socket activation [2]. I strongly recommend you
> > configure it this way if you intend to manage libvirt in Pacemaker.
>
> Yes, I'd like to! Any pointers?
Follow the link. It's all described there.
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
> At what timne exactly? When pacemaker starts, or when the systemd using is
> about to be started?
Pacemaker adds the drop-in just before it starts the resource, and it
removes the drop-in just after it stops the resource. It's entire purpose
is to
>>> Chris Murphy schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 06:13 in
Nachricht
:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:56 AM Phillip Susi wrote:
>>
>>
>> Chris Murphy writes:
>>
>> >> It sounds like you are arguing that it is better to do the wrong thing
>> >> on all SSDs rather than do the right thing on ones that aren't
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
> As for the drop-ins: I neither know what those are expected to do, not who
> adds them at run time. See "documentation"...
The 50-pacemaker.conf drop-ins are, as their name suggests, created by
Pacemaker.
Specifically, Pacemaker's systemd resource
Hi!
So this is kind of a follow-up to the thread in [1], and the
corresponding PR in [2].
In short, the PR made some changes to allow for cases where /proc was
not available in the mount namespace of the service, and added a test
[3] to make sure that this would work. This test was later
>>> "Ulrich Windl" schrieb am 09.02.2021
um
10:28 in Nachricht <602255b402a10003e...@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>:
Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 10:14 in
> Nachricht
> :
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ulrich Windl
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks and "back to the mess": If I use
Am 09.02.21 um 08:54 schrieb Ulrich Windl:
Reindl Harald schrieb am 08.02.2021 um 19:01 in
Nachricht :
Am 08.02.21 um 18:27 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On So, 07.02.21 22:43, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909805
In response
Am 08.02.21 um 20:23 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:01 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.21 um 18:27 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On So, 07.02.21 22:43, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909805
In response to
>>> Michael Chapman schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 11:28 in
Nachricht <74f975f6-1ef2-ee64-bf95-415a5626...@very.puzzling.org>:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> [...]
>> OK, I tried (staring libvirtd.service with ‑‑listen and without ‑‑timout):
>> Feb 09 10:59:23 h18 libvirtd[42540]: ‑‑listen
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
> OK, I tried (staring libvirtd.service with --listen and without --timout):
> Feb 09 10:59:23 h18 libvirtd[42540]: --listen parameter not permitted with
> systemd activation sockets, see 'man libvirtd' for further guidance
> Feb 09 10:59:23 h18
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 10:14 in
Nachricht
:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks and "back to the mess": If I use libvirtd.service instead of
>> libvirtd-tls.socket, it does *not* open the TLS socket, even though the
>> configuration file
>>> Michael Chapman schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 10:17 in
Nachricht :
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> [...]
>> At what timne exactly? When pacemaker starts, or when the systemd using is
>> about to be started?
>
> Pacemaker adds the drop‑in just before it starts the resource, and it
>
Chris Murphy writes:
> Basically correct. It will merge random writes such that they become
> sequential writes. But it means inserts/appends/overwrites for a file
> won't be located with the original extents.
Wait, I thoguht that was only true for metadata, not normal file data
blocks? Well,
>>> Phillip Susi schrieb am 09.02.2021 um 15:53 in
>>> Nachricht
<87o8gtz3m1@vps.thesusis.net>:
> Chris Murphy writes:
>
>> Basically correct. It will merge random writes such that they become
>> sequential writes. But it means inserts/appends/overwrites for a file
>> won't be located with
Chris Murphy writes:
> And I agree 8MB isn't a big deal. Does anyone complain about journal
> fragmentation on ext4 or xfs? If not, then we come full circle to my
> second email in the thread which is don't defragment when nodatacow,
> only defragment when datacow. Or use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:17 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 08.02.21 um 23:42 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:31 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>> I think removing this symlink would prevent /sys/fs/fuse/connections
> >>> from being mounted and the fuse module from being loaded
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:47 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 09.02.21 um 17:13 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:17 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 08.02.21 um 23:42 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:31 PM Reindl Harald
> >>> wrote:
> >
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:02 AM Phillip Susi wrote:
>
>
> Chris Murphy writes:
>
> > Basically correct. It will merge random writes such that they become
> > sequential writes. But it means inserts/appends/overwrites for a file
> > won't be located with the original extents.
>
> Wait, I thoguht
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:19 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:05 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 09.02.21 um 23:18 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:47 AM Reindl Harald
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Am 09.02.21 um 17:13 schrieb Mike
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:05 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 09.02.21 um 23:18 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:47 AM Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 09.02.21 um 17:13 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:17 AM Reindl Harald
> >>> wrote:
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
