hello..
we are currently using reiserfs on our root-partition..
since reiserfs always sets d_type to DT_UNKNOWN in dirent entries some
tools like systemd-tmpfiles do not work as expected.
in src/util.c:3905 DT_UNKNOWN is already included when checking file for
type DT_REG or DT_LNK.
hi..
On 03/03/11 13:52, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
since reiserfs always sets d_type to DT_UNKNOWN in dirent entries some tools
like systemd-tmpfiles do not work as expected.
Hmm .. this could be the reason for my problem with utmp:
it started with a missing utmp and i tracked it down to
On Thu, 03.03.11 09:14, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 02.03.11 11:41, Andrey Borzenkov
On Thu, 03.03.11 07:51, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 02.03.11 11:41, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
It is expected that system will put reboot in wtmp to mark
when
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Marius Tolzmann tolzm...@molgen.mpg.de wrote:
hi..
On 03/03/11 13:52, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
since reiserfs always sets d_type to DT_UNKNOWN in dirent entries some
tools
like systemd-tmpfiles do not work as expected.
Hmm .. this could be the reason for my
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 03.03.11 09:14, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Lennart Poettering
Some file systems (at least, reiserfs) return DT_UNKNOWN for
every directory entry in readdir(). So far in several places
systemd filtered on DT_REG/DT_LNK and so skipped any file on
such filesystems. It affected systemd-update-utmp, systemd-modules-load
and systemd-tty-ask-password-agent.
This
On Thu, 03.03.11 13:05, Marius Tolzmann (tolzm...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote:
hello..
we are currently using reiserfs on our root-partition..
Urks, people still use that cruft?
since reiserfs always sets d_type to DT_UNKNOWN in dirent entries
some tools like systemd-tmpfiles do not work as
On Thu, 03.03.11 18:27, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
Some file systems (at least, reiserfs) return DT_UNKNOWN for
every directory entry in readdir(). So far in several places
systemd filtered on DT_REG/DT_LNK and so skipped any file on
such filesystems. It affected
Hello..
this looks fine.. and is better than just adding DT_UNKOWN 8)
i additionally patched the cgroup-util.c (see attachment)
thx for the patch..
m.
On 03/03/11 16:27, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
Some file systems (at least, reiserfs) return DT_UNKNOWN for
every directory entry in readdir().
oops.. sorry.. wrong patch sent...
this won't compile.. but since lennart also fixed it it seems to be
obsolete anyway... 8)
m.
On 03/03/11 16:36, Marius Tolzmann wrote:
Hello..
this looks fine.. and is better than just adding DT_UNKOWN 8)
i additionally patched the cgroup-util.c (see
hi
On 03/03/11 16:30, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 03.03.11 13:05, Marius Tolzmann (tolzm...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote:
hello..
we are currently using reiserfs on our root-partition..
Urks, people still use that cruft?
at least we do..
.. how is this supposed to be handled? if the
]] Lennart Poettering
Hi,
| But it's a promise you are making there that you cannot keep. If you
| want to support /usr on a separate partition then you'd need to do all
| the work and move the PCI and USB databases to /, move libatasmart,
| fix udisks, fix D-Bus and so on.
I leave that to
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 06:45:21PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 03.03.11 17:58, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
| To boot a system, enough must be present on the root partition to
| mount other filesystems. This includes utilities,
On Thu, 03.03.11 19:42, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
]] Tomasz Torcz
| I don't get it. What during the boot (before /usr is mounted) require
pci.db,
| usb ids, why udisks would be started?
udev rules that reference the name rather than the USB/PCI vendor or
product ID is
On Thu, 03.03.11 19:21, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
But it's a promise you are making there that you cannot keep. If you
want to support /usr on a separate partition then you'd need to do all
the work and move the PCI and USB databases to /, move libatasmart,
fix udisks,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:39:03PM -0300, Pablo Hess wrote:
Not supporting a separate /usr would be a major setback for systemd, IMO.
Separate /usr has nothing to do with systemd. It just the way current
distribution
work. Systemd is just a messenger, don't shot it because of friendly
On Thu, 03.03.11 17:39, Pablo Hess (natunobi...@gentoobr.org) wrote:
Would it work better if /usr was an automounted target?
That would probably blow up in your face, since a lot of programs used
during early boot end up accessing /usr and would stay stuck
Aren't /usr/bin and
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:51:52PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Why? systemd just warns you. systemd itself works fine with sperate
/usr. It's just a statement on the general ecosystem, a statement of
fact on the status quo.
systemd is just the messenger. Don't shoot the messenger.
If
19 matches
Mail list logo
