Hello.
After upgrade to systemd-24 my sshd.socket after some time die.
netstat -nal | grep 22 says nothing.
systemctl status sshd.socket says:
Active: failed
Accepted: 2652 Connected:1
In mesages:
getty@tty1.service holdoff timer over, scheduling restart.
I'm use cloudfuse module to access remote storage.
If i mount -a after system booted in multi-user.target all work's fine
But automount in boot process not work:
[5.629611] 27systemd[1]: Failed to initialize automounter: No such
file or directory
/etc/fstab:
cloudfuse /mnt
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:22:32AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.04.11 13:52, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:15:01PM +0200, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Ok, now I'm starting with systemd.unit=setup.service. There are some
issues however:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:43:36AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 18.03.11 13:40, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM, fykc...@gmail.com
Hi all,
The second version of patch Fix broken syscall(__NR_fanotify_mark...
on 32bit mips.
Changes since v1:
1. Use __LP64__ to detect whether in a 64bit environment.
2. Some code clean up.
Fix-broken-__NR_fanotify_mark.-on-32bit-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:02:51 +0200 Albert Strasheim full...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again
I had the same problem again today trying to start a service.
Hello everybody,
I have the same problem on a number of Arch Linux Systems. The boot process
stalls untill
On Wed, 20.04.11 10:47, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
I'm use cloudfuse module to access remote storage.
If i mount -a after system booted in multi-user.target all work's fine
But automount in boot process not work:
[5.629611] 27systemd[1]: Failed to initialize
On Wed, 20.04.11 07:16, Rainer Gerhards (rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com) wrote:
I believe it's an rsyslog (imuxsock module) newer feature to limit
flow
from extra-verbose apps by default, which you can tune or
completely
bypass, as described in the docs:
I know that (and I
On Wed, 20.04.11 10:49, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
The logger service needs the kmsg-syslogd service around? Did you remove
that from your build?
I found the problem:
systemd-logger.service has After=syslog.socket but no Require. I with a
multi-user or graphical
On Wed, 20.04.11 11:24, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
If this is for SSH keys and stuff you might even want to split this up
into several units and just look for the sshd key files
directly. i.e. stick in your ssh-keygen.service something like this:
On Wed, 20.04.11 12:12, Christian Hesse (l...@eworm.de) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:02:51 +0200 Albert Strasheim full...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again
I had the same problem again today trying to start a service.
Hello everybody,
I have the same problem on a number of Arch Linux
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:04:55 +0200
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 20.04.11 12:12, Christian Hesse (l...@eworm.de) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:02:51 +0200 Albert Strasheim
full...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again
I had the same problem again today trying
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:01:05PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 20.04.11 11:24, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
If this is for SSH keys and stuff you might even want to split this up
into several units and just look for the sshd key files
directly. i.e.
On Wed, 20.04.11 16:55, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:01:05PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 20.04.11 11:24, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
If this is for SSH keys and stuff you might even want to split this
Will do, thanks for the input and help.
-Chris
On 04/19/2011 04:07 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.04.11 13:57, Chris Ferron (chris.e.fer...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
Heya,
Please send patches to the systemd-devel mailing list, as
systemd-commits is only for notifications of actual
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:16 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:22:08AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 20.04.11 09:15, fykc...@gmail.com (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
2011/4/20 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
On Thu, 14.04.11 17:34,
On Wed, 20.04.11 17:01, Christian Hesse (l...@eworm.de) wrote:
Ok, got one step further I think.
The scripts in my initrd call
$ /sbin/vgchange --sysinit -a y
I think this breaks udev in any way? After calling
$ vgchange -a n vgchange -a y
everything seems to work fine. I can run
as an exercise for the reader.
That's basically the same patch as this one, right?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20110420/be2d393b/attachment.obj
It looks like it might do the same thing. Someone should try it on an
o32 MIPS userland running on a mips64 kernel.
I think
depends on the endianness. Figuring out the correct order is left
as an exercise for the reader.
That's basically the same patch as this one, right?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20110420/be2d393b/attachment.obj
It looks like it might do the same thing
I'm going to set a high bar for you here:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Poelzleithner
poe...@poelzi.org wrote:
I'm currently implementing a dynamic linux kernel optimizer called
ulatencyd [1]. In my opinion the desktop experience (which applies to
servers as well) can be much
of mask_low, mask_high in the syscall argument list
depends on the endianness. Figuring out the correct order is left
as an exercise for the reader.
That's basically the same patch as this one, right?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20110420/be2d393b/attachment.obj
://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20110420/be2d393b/attachment.obj
It looks like it might do the same thing. Someone should try it on
an o32 MIPS userland running on a mips64 kernel.
I think the behavior of the union thing is undefined, but should
work on GCC.
Hmm, but unions
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:38:54PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
At this point we have collected a few components of systemd that are of
little or no use on embedded systems. To mind come here hostnamed, the
binfmt handling, the console handling or even readahead.
On Wed, 20.04.11 15:20, David Daney (dda...@caviumnetworks.com) wrote:
Hmm, OK. Do you happen to know which predefined userspace macro we
should check against for the o32 ABI?
There seems to be __mips__, but that probably covers both ABIs?
How about (untested):
#if defined(__mips__)
2011/4/21 David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com:
Any comment whether this will break non-MIPS 32bit archs, like x86?
It would break the MIPS n32 ABI userspace.
On MIPS n32 we are still __LP64__, but 64-bit values are passed in a single
register.
It isn't a problem. n32 syscall supports 64bit
On 04/20/2011 06:02 PM, fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/21 David Daneydda...@caviumnetworks.com:
Any comment whether this will break non-MIPS 32bit archs, like x86?
It would break the MIPS n32 ABI userspace.
On MIPS n32 we are still __LP64__, but 64-bit values are passed in a single
on the endianness. Figuring out the correct order is left
as an exercise for the reader.
That's basically the same patch as this one, right?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20110420/be2d393b/attachment.obj
It looks like it might do the same thing. Someone should try
in the syscall argument list
depends on the endianness. Figuring out the correct order is left
as an exercise for the reader.
That's basically the same patch as this one, right?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20110420/be2d393b/attachment.obj
It looks like it might
2011/4/21 Eric Paris epa...@redhat.com:
I am pretty arch stupid, and I have no idea at all if it is related, but
I'm looking at kernel commit 5e844b31c2ace282ab8bea630b63e0212d9532d4
which wires up the fanotify syscalls for mips. I see that it used a u64
for a3 and a4 when these are only
The third version of patch Fix broken syscall(__NR_fanotify_mark...
on o32 mips.
Changes since v2:
1. Condition of whether split 64bit argument is now gated by ''defined
_MIPS_SIM _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI32.
Thank David for pointing it out.
--
Regards,
- cee1
Heya,
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-25.tar.bz2
Bigger changes:
- This now includes hostnamed as already announced on this mailing list
- You may now use auto and comment=systemd.automount on the same
fstab entry so that a mount point is set up as automount, and
On Thu, 21.04.11 09:55, fykc...@gmail.com (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
The third version of patch Fix broken syscall(__NR_fanotify_mark...
on o32 mips.
Changes since v2:
1. Condition of whether split 64bit argument is now gated by ''defined
_MIPS_SIM _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI32.
Thank
32 matches
Mail list logo
