Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 203

2013-05-07 Thread Michael Biebl
2013/5/7 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net: * libsystemd-logind.so gained a new call sd_get_machine_names() to enumerate running containers and VMs (currently only supported by very new libvirt and nspawn). sd_login_monitor can now be used to watch

Re: [systemd-devel] wake from sleep on systemd timer

2013-05-07 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 12:10:26AM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: [...] Meanwhile, where's a good place to contribute my systemd unit files I created for different services that not yet seem to be covered by the systemd distribution? They could also need some review maybe... Upstream - submit

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd user instance

2013-05-07 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 05/06/2013 10:14 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com schrieb: But now I want to (and need to) give some users cron-like abilities. I discovered that systemd supports user instances - perfect! Then install cronie... That's the obvious solution but a little bit

[systemd-devel] systemd-cgroups-agent failed to get dbus connection

2013-05-07 Thread Ross Lagerwall
Hi, I have noticed sometimes during shutdown, the following message appears on screen twice: systemd-cgroups-agent failed to get dbus connection: failed to connect to socket /org/freedesktop/systemd/private connection refused The following may be relevant from the logs: May 07 09:13:05 hobo

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 203

2013-05-07 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 07/05/13 01:41 did gyre and gimble: This is probably a good release to synchronize a distribution on. For example, it is our goal that this is the version we will include in Fedora 19, more or less. You said that about 195 and then promptly shipped

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 203

2013-05-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 07.05.13 06:36, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: 2013/5/7 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net: * libsystemd-logind.so gained a new call sd_get_machine_names() to enumerate running containers and VMs (currently only supported by very new

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 203

2013-05-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 07.05.13 09:53, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 07/05/13 01:41 did gyre and gimble: This is probably a good release to synchronize a distribution on. For example, it is our goal that this is the version we will include in

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 203

2013-05-07 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 05/07/2013 08:53 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 07/05/13 01:41 did gyre and gimble: This is probably a good release to synchronize a distribution on. For example, it is our goal that this is the version we will include in Fedora 19, more or less. You said

Re: [systemd-devel] Masking systemd-journal-flush and setting journal storage to persistent

2013-05-07 Thread Umut Tezduyar
Hi, No worries. Maybe you want to add systemd-journal-flush.service to man systemd-journald. Maybe altering the help text as following too: To make the data persistent it is sufficient to create /var/log/journal/ where systemd-journald-flush.service will then store the data. On Mon, May 6,

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] condition, man: Add support for ConditionSecurity=smack

2013-05-07 Thread Karol Lewandowski
Signed-off-by: Karol Lewandowski k.lewando...@samsung.com diff --git a/man/systemd.unit.xml b/man/systemd.unit.xml index 49103da..256c813 100644 --- a/man/systemd.unit.xml +++ b/man/systemd.unit.xml @@ -984,8 +984,9 @@ may be used to check whether the given

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] condition, man: Add support for ConditionSecurity=smack

2013-05-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 07.05.13 13:21, Karol Lewandowski (k.lewando...@samsung.com) wrote: Heya, Hmm, does that directory always exist? Or only if AppArmor is actually runtime enabled? I.e. this check should ideally only return true if SMACK is not only built into the kernel, but actually really enabled

[systemd-devel] Any movement on adding a pid indicator for setroubleshoot to add to the journal entry.

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Really would like to be able to track an alert back to the causing pid. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Start ctrl-alt-del.target irreversibly

2013-05-07 Thread Eelco Dolstra
This makes ctrl-alt-del reboots more robust, just like systemctl reboot. --- src/core/manager.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/core/manager.c b/src/core/manager.c index c7f8f20..0508628 100644 --- a/src/core/manager.c +++ b/src/core/manager.c @@ -1372,7

Re: [systemd-devel] Any movement on adding a pid indicator for setroubleshoot to add to the journal entry.

2013-05-07 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: Really would like to be able to track an alert back to the causing pid. You mean the: * introduce generic AUGMENT_PID=, AUGMENT_DEVICE= fields item in the TODO list, right? A facility that one process can submit

Re: [systemd-devel] Any movement on adding a pid indicator for setroubleshoot to add to the journal entry.

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/07/2013 08:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: Really would like to be able to track an alert back to the causing pid. You mean the: * introduce generic AUGMENT_PID=,

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] condition, man: Add support for ConditionSecurity=smack

2013-05-07 Thread Karol Lewandowski
On 05/07/2013 01:32 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 07.05.13 13:21, Karol Lewandowski (k.lewando...@samsung.com) wrote: Heya, Hmm, does that directory always exist? Or only if AppArmor is actually runtime enabled? /sys/fs/smackfs is only registered when smack lsm is actually

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd user instance

2013-05-07 Thread Kai Krakow
Kok, Auke-jan H auke-jan.h@intel.com schrieb: [Service] User=%I PAMName=systemd-shared ^^ this line is the cause of your problems, as the /etc/pam.d/systemd-shared file does not exist. I thought this is virtually profided by pam_systemd.so? But I may try your suggestion. Regards,

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd user instance

2013-05-07 Thread Kai Krakow
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com schrieb: But now I want to (and need to) give some users cron-like abilities. I discovered that systemd supports user instances - perfect! Then install cronie... That's the obvious solution but a little bit counter-productive with respect to my

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd user instance

2013-05-07 Thread Kai Krakow
Well, actually the timers are a nice benefit only. We want to control user- initiated background-services for a web application server with this and cron hasn't been our best friend for this in the past. David Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net schrieb: I don't recommend spawning user instances of

Re: [systemd-devel] journalctl v202, loop endlessly

2013-05-07 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Cristian Rodríguez crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote: El 05/05/13 13:17, Sébastien Luttringer escribió: Hello, journcalctl --no-pager or journalctl | cat produce enless content by looping accross journal entries. The date in lines restart from the beginning when