On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
struct sd_rtnl_message would keep two additional pointers into the hdr
field. Every time hdr was realloced, those pointers should be adjusted,
but weren't.
Or rather, only one of the two were adjusted, right?
Hi guys,
I just pushed the last couple of patches to enable DHCPv4 support in
networkd[0]. Testing and feedback would be greatly appreciated.
It is still very basic, but I'm personally using it full-time on my
laptop (replacing NetworkManager/ConnMan), so it should be complete
enough to at least
systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that when booting without
active consumer (let's say no NFS mounts in fstab) network-online.target
is not started at all. If NFS is mounted manually later, no
synchronization point
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:43:15PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that when booting without
active consumer (let's say no NFS mounts in fstab) network-online.target
is not started
В Ср, 01/01/2014 в 15:00 -0500, Dave Reisner пишет:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:43:15PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that when booting without
active consumer (let's say no NFS
Am 01.01.2014 22:13, schrieb Andrey Borzenkov:
В Ср, 01/01/2014 в 15:00 -0500, Dave Reisner пишет:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:43:15PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
systemd.special(7) suggests that network-online.target should be pulled
in by consumer. Unfortunately, that means that when
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
I just pushed the last couple of patches to enable DHCPv4 support in
networkd[0]. Testing and feedback would be greatly appreciated.
It is still very basic, but I'm personally using it full-time on my
laptop (replacing
